281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4866678)
1. The use of projective methods in research: 1947-1965.
Crenshaw DA; Bohn S; Hoffman MR; Matheus JM; Offenbach SG
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Feb; 32(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 4866678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of some "test dimensions" conceptions.
SEEMAN W; MARKS PA
J Proj Tech; 1962 Dec; 26():469-73. PubMed ID: 13987646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A review of projective test findings with older adults.
Panek PE; Wagner EE; Kennedy-Zwergel K
J Pers Assess; 1983 Dec; 47(6):562-82. PubMed ID: 6363672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The practice of clinical psychology in the United States.
Wildman RW; Wildman RW
J Clin Psychol; 1967 Jul; 23(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 4384179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Theoretical concepts of projective methods of studying personality in non-Soviet psychology and pathopsychology (survey of the literature)].
Bleĭkher VM; Burlachuk LF
Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1972; 72(5):757-62. PubMed ID: 4560548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. SOME REFLECTIONS ON PERSONALITY EXPLORERS, 1938-1963.
SHNEIDMAN ES
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1964 Jun; 28():156-60. PubMed ID: 14175631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Psychological changes in a group of tuberculous patients examined by projective tests (Rorschach and TAT)].
SAMALE L
Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr; 1954; 15(4-5):397-436. PubMed ID: 13218931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential prediction of a specific behavior from three projective techniques.
VERNIER CM; WHITING JF; MELTZER ML
J Consult Psychol; 1955 Jun; 19(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 14381550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. AN INTERPRETATION OF PROJECTIVE FINDINGS IN A CASE OF FEMALE TRANSSEXUALISM.
MCCULLY RS
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1963 Dec; 27():436-46. PubMed ID: 14083251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Projective tests].
Pichot P; Perse J
Rev Prat; 1973 Apr; 23(23):2075-84. PubMed ID: 4584279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Projective methods and dangerous behavior].
Mormont C
Acta Psychiatr Belg; 1988; 88(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 3051890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EFFECT OF TEST ORDER UPON RORSCHACH HUMAN CONTENT.
VANDECASTLE RL
J Consult Psychol; 1964 Jun; 28():286-8. PubMed ID: 14174918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Blind test interpretation to overcome student resistance to projective techniques courses.
Rader GE; Schill TR
J Pers Assess; 1973 Jun; 37(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 4575075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bias in postdiction from projective tests.
SOSKIN WF
J Abnorm Psychol; 1954 Jan; 49(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 13128963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The metamorphosis of projective methods.
Klopfer WG
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Oct; 32(5):402-4. PubMed ID: 4879248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The relation of certain Rorschach variables to expression of affect in the TAT and SCT.
CARR AC
J Proj Tech; 1956 Jun; 20(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 13332613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Projective methodologies.
Fisher S
Annu Rev Psychol; 1967; 18():165-90. PubMed ID: 5333546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. FREQUENCY HYPOTHESIS AND CONTENT ANALYSIS OF PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES.
WALLACE J; SECHREST L
J Consult Psychol; 1963 Oct; 27():387-93. PubMed ID: 14076394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical identification of compensatory structures on projective tests: a self psychological approach.
Silverstein ML
J Pers Assess; 2001 Jun; 76(3):517-36. PubMed ID: 11499462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The prognostic value of the Bender-Gestalt, H-T-P, TAT, and sentence completion test.
COWDEN RC; DEABLER HL; FEAMSTER JH
J Clin Psychol; 1955 Jul; 11(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 14381526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
