These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4866943)

  • 21. [The study of linear dimensional changes in alginate impressions].
    Gyimesi J; Hajduk A; Mandula J
    Fogorv Sz; 1973 Aug; 66(8):250-2. PubMed ID: 4581605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Problems posed by the choice and use of an elastomer in the setting of the impressions].
    Decloquement C
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1982 Sep; 11(4):249-51. PubMed ID: 6755605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Guidelines for accurate impression-making techniques.
    Gennaro R
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 16(9):634, 636. PubMed ID: 15597526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Polysulfides enjoy quarter century of success.
    CAL; 1982 May; 45(11):13-5, 18-20. PubMed ID: 7049329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Sources of error in various impression technics in the dental practice].
    Plischka G; Sorger F
    Osterr Z Stomatol; 1970; 67(6):207-14. PubMed ID: 4912793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Working times of elastomeric impression materials according to dimensional stability and detail reproduction.
    Tan E; Chai J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 8595114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Section impression--a technical evaluation of materials].
    Oilo G
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1973 Jan; 83(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 4570395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative evaluation of different impression materials. Part I/consistency, dimensional accuracy & stability.
    Badawy MM; Sanad ME; Bahnassawy HI; Shalaby HS
    Egypt Dent J; 1986 Oct; 32(4):317-31. PubMed ID: 3467963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Hydrocolloids in daily practice].
    Cadafalch Gabriel E
    Rev Esp Estomatol; 1981; 29(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 7036262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Dimensional accuracy obtained from multiple impressions of cavity preparations. II. Mercaptans (polysulfide polymers)].
    Sansiviero A; Miura M; Simonetti EL; de Carvalho RC
    Rev Fac Odontol Sao Jose Dos Campos; 1975; 4(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 801841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Evolution of the impression technic in relation to new materials].
    Huberman M
    Rev Fr Odontostomatol; 1967 Oct; 14(8):1303-44. PubMed ID: 4864546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Myodynamic impression technics. Study of reproducibility II].
    Karlsson S; Hedegård B
    Tandlakartidningen; 1976 Aug; 68(15-16):846-9. PubMed ID: 802434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Which method of impression is better? What material should be used?].
    Vargas Tovar E
    ADM; 1964; 21(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 4881879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Experimental testing of physical properties of impression materials for edentulous jaw in various processing conditions].
    Welker D; Hopf C; Rothamel G
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1973 Oct; 23(10):725-42. PubMed ID: 4588554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Control of polymerization in the dispensing cartridge of automixing impression systems.
    Netti CA; Yard RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jul; 64(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 2200877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A polyether impression rubber.
    Braden M; Causton B; Clarke RL
    J Dent Res; 1972; 51(4):889-96. PubMed ID: 4504706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improvements in impression materials give more predictable results.
    Strassler HE
    MSDA J; 1996; 39(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9569870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Estimation of impression quality in fixed prosthesis oral rehabilitation].
    Muradov MA; Riakhovskiĭ AN; Khamzatov RM
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2013; 92(4):50-6. PubMed ID: 23994858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Dental impression materials--discriminating characteristics of elastomers and alginates].
    Schoenmakers HP
    Rev Belge Med Dent; 1979; 34(3):275-86. PubMed ID: 396593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.