These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 486817)

  • 21. [Speech sound discrimination and hearing-aid performance of severely hearing impaired school children].
    Nakanishi Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1982 Apr; 85(4):422-31. PubMed ID: 7119926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An audiological test battery for speech communication diagnosis in severe hearing loss.
    Risberg A; Agelfors E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():5-10. PubMed ID: 6577575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of speech discrimination scores by using PB-50 lists and the speech discrimination scale with hearing-impaired adults.
    Beykirch HL; Gaeth JH
    J Aud Res; 1978 Jul; 18(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 755810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing auditory capabilities in young children.
    Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Boothroyd A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1339-50. PubMed ID: 17604127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of objective and subjective measures of speech intelligibility in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Rivera IM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 34(4):904-15. PubMed ID: 1956197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interlist equivalency of the CID W-22 word lists presented in quiet and in noise.
    Loven FC; Hawkins DB
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 6840418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A children's Spanish word discrimination test for non-Spanish-speaking clinicians.
    Comstock CL; Martin FN
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 6734968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise : Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test].
    Memmeler T; Schönweiler R; Wollenberg B; Löhler J
    HNO; 2019 Feb; 67(2):118-125. PubMed ID: 30519714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vowel confusions of hearing-impaired listeners under reverberant and nonreverberant conditions.
    Nabelek AK; Letowski TR
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 3990258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Proposal for implementing the Sentence Recognition Index in individuals with hearing disorders.
    Costa MJ; Santos SN; Lessa AH; Mezzomo CL
    Codas; 2015; 27(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 26107080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words.
    Beattie RC; Raffin MJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 3990262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monaural vs binaural speech reception threshold and word discrimination scores in the hearing impaired.
    Siegenthaler BM; Craig CH
    J Aud Res; 1981 Apr; 21(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 7052803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Between and within listener variability in response to CID W-22 presented in noise.
    Gengel RW; Miller L; Rosenthal E
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(2):78-81. PubMed ID: 7227677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Closed-Set Speech Discrimination Tests for Assessing Young Children.
    Vickers DA; Moore BCJ; Majeed A; Stephenson N; Alferaih H; Baer T; Marriage JE
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 29189292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Use of Freiburg monosyllabic test words in the contemporary German language : Currentness of the test words].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):549-56. PubMed ID: 27286726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of a monosyllabic adaptive speech test (MAST) with young children.
    Mackie K; Dermody P
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3724121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of time gating and word length on isolated word-recognition performance.
    Craig CH; Kim BW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):808-15. PubMed ID: 2273893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Development of a new test for speech audiometry in children and results in CI children].
    Völter C; Shehata-Dieler W; Baumann R; Helms J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Oct; 84(10):738-43. PubMed ID: 16231241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.