These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4877309)
1. Evaluation of PathoTec-tm strips in diagnostic bacteriology. Small NN Am J Med Technol; 1968 Feb; 34(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 4877309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of PathoTec strips in medical bacteriology. Jeans B Can J Med Technol; 1967 Aug; 29(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 4863814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AN EVALUATION OF REAGENT-IMPREGNATED PAPER STRIPS FOR USE IN THE PROCESS OF IDENTIFYING CERTAIN SPECIES OF CLINICALLY IMPORTANT BACTERIA. GANDELMAN AL; MANN PH Curr Ther Res Clin Exp; 1965 Feb; 7():130-8. PubMed ID: 14260086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Anaerobic indicators: a review. Drollette DD Am J Med Technol; 1969 Dec; 35(12):758-60. PubMed ID: 4902345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of reagent-impregnated strips for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Martin WJ; Bartes SF; Ball MM Am J Med Technol; 1971 Mar; 37(3):99-101. PubMed ID: 4927898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbiological reagents in search of precision. Fodor AR Health Lab Sci; 1968 Jan; 5(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 4866317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the PathoTec "Rapid I-D System" and two additional Experimental reagent-impregnated paper strips. Rosner R Appl Microbiol; 1973 Dec; 26(6):890-3. PubMed ID: 4588197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Observations on the use of anaerobic jars and the methods of their control. Jarvis JD; Bruten DM Med Lab Technol; 1972 Jul; 29(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 4561825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Experiences with uricult, a new method for the quantitative determination of bacteria in urine]. Breitfellner G Wien Med Wochenschr; 1970 Apr; 120(14):235-43. PubMed ID: 4933975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality control in diagnostic microbiology. Vera HD Health Lab Sci; 1971 Jul; 8(3):176-89. PubMed ID: 4934938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of seven commercial oxidase test products with Pasteurella. Weaver N; Collins MT Am J Vet Res; 1982 Feb; 43(2):363-4. PubMed ID: 7046539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The philosophy of the application of automatic methods to hospital diagnostic bacteriology. Trotman RE Biomed Eng; 1973 Dec; 8(12):519-21. PubMed ID: 4588038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of spot esculin hydrolysis with the PathoTec strip test for rapid differentiation of anaerobic bacteria. Qadri SM; Johnson S; Smith JC; Zubairi S; Gillum RL J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 7016896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The equipment and application of the bacteriology laboratory of the small health department]. TALJAARD CM Public Health; 1963 Apr; 63():19-24. PubMed ID: 13984774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Usefulness of strip tests Patho-Tec (Godecke) in bacteriological examinations]. Midro A Wiad Lek; 1975 Mar; 28(6):513-6. PubMed ID: 1091098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Investigations on the suitability of different diluents and culture methods for cultural germ counts in pelletized feed samples]. Hörter R; Klein H Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig; 1969; 211(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 4916935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Screening examinations--the new trend in laboratory diagnosis. II. Screening practice. Screening tests]. Tomaszewski L Przegl Lek; 1973; 30(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 4572766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic methods in bacteriology]. Pérez Gorricho B An Esp Pediatr; 1989 Sep; 31 Suppl 38():149-53. PubMed ID: 2490611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]