These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests. Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing. Jørgensen S; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Room and head coloration can induce obligatory stream segregation. David M; Lavandier M; Grimault N J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 24993189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech. Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Algorithmic modeling of the irrelevant sound effect (ISE) by the hearing sensation fluctuation strength. Schlittmeier SJ; Weissgerber T; Kerber S; Fastl H; Hellbrück J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):194-203. PubMed ID: 22038665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical bandwidth speech: Arrays of subcritical band speech maintain near-ceiling intelligibility at high amplitudes. Warren RM; Bashford JA; Lenz PW J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL222. PubMed ID: 28372079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation. Park HK; Bradley JS J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments. Westermann A; Buchholz JM J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry. Han H; Lee J; Cho S; Kim J; Lee K; Choi WD Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners. Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners. Liu C; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 22979831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences. Stilp CE J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural realignment of spatially separated sound components. Salminen NH; Takanen M; Santala O; Alku P; Pulkki V J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3356-65. PubMed ID: 26093425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking. Roman N; Woodruff J J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]