These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4887209)
1. [Ultrasonic equipment for calculus removal]. Calmettes P Dentoscope; 1968; 5():13-5. PubMed ID: 4887209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Ultrasonic equipment for removal of calculus. Requirement of the user]. Dargent P Dentoscope; 1968; 5():11. PubMed ID: 4887208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [New sonic vibration instrument for the removal of tartar]. Prando G; Garberoglio R; Castagnola L Riv Odontoiatr Amici Brugg; 1984; 3(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 6382086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The use of the rotosonic ablator of calculus in therapy of periodontal disease]. Zucchi F; Conforti G Mondo Odontostomatol; 1965; 7(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 5318941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved efficacy of calculus removal in furcations using ultrasonic diamond-coated inserts. Scott JB; Steed-Veilands AM; Yukna RA Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Aug; 19(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 10709502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pain during prophylaxis treatment elicited by two power-driven instruments. Kocher T; Rodemerk B; Fanghänel J; Meissner G J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):535-8. PubMed ID: 15842271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of instruments for calculus removal]. Märkl R Zahnarztl Prax; 1968 Jul; 19(14):157-8. PubMed ID: 5246454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [A comparative evaluation of several methods of calculus removal]. Iida K; Kita S Hokkaido Shika Ishikai Shi; 1966 Mar; 21():25-9. PubMed ID: 5222393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [A comparative SEM study of the tooth surface after removal of dental calculus by hand-held instruments and ultrasound]. Fassmann A; Hornová J; Sindelka Z; Tomásková L Cesk Stomatol; 1981 Jan; 81(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 6938315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Subjective intensity of pain during ultrasonic supragingival calculus removal. Braun A; Jepsen S; Krause F J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Aug; 34(8):668-72. PubMed ID: 17535284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative in vitro studies of various compressed air-operated instruments used for dental calculus removal]. Hüttmann J; Plagmann HC Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Jul; 40(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 3868584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The removal of dental calculi using the ultrasonic scaler]. Hirokawa M Koku Eisei Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Mar; 22(1):46-78. PubMed ID: 4505830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Tartar removal by hand instruments and by ultrasonic apparatus. Current approaches and recent findings]. Picarelli A; Alessio R; Fossato L Minerva Stomatol; 1984; 33(5):801-9. PubMed ID: 6394984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro. Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evolution of chemical prophylaxis. Berke JB Your Child Patient; 1967; 6(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 5241232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]