101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4888060)
1. Clinical psychologists' ratings of MAPS figures along a social withdrawal scale.
Neuringer C
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1969 Feb; 33(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 4888060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of clinical judgments based on human figure drawings.
Wanderer ZW
J Consult Clin Psychol; 1969 Apr; 33(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 4890996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychologists' judgments of physical handicap from H-T-P drawings.
JOHNSON OG; WAWRZASZEK F
J Consult Psychol; 1961 Aug; 25():284-7. PubMed ID: 13790319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-reports and case histories of schizophrenic patients: reliability and validity of Phillips scale ratings.
Dewolfe AS
J Clin Psychol; 1968 Oct; 24(4):Suppl:415-8. PubMed ID: 5685243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The validity of projective techniques and their research and clinical contribution.
Blatt SJ
J Pers Assess; 1975 Aug; 39(4):327-43. PubMed ID: 1104801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Judgments of psychopathology from art productions of children.
Rubin JA; Schachter J
Confin Psychiatr; 1972; 15(3):237-52. PubMed ID: 4568793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DAP: back against the wall?
Hammer EF
J Consult Clin Psychol; 1969 Apr; 33(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 4890997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical psychologists' judgments of the scientific merit and clinical relevance of psychotherapy outcome research.
Cohen LH
J Consult Clin Psychol; 1979 Apr; 47(2):421-3. PubMed ID: 469098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of projective tests to psychotherapy: a case study.
Aronow E; Reznikoff M
J Pers Assess; 1971 Aug; 35(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 4935854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Percentage conversions as a method of enhancing clinical discriminations.
Wagner EE; Prospero MK; Alexander RA
J Pers Assess; 1984 Dec; 48(6):617-9. PubMed ID: 6394739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximizing split-half reliability estimates for projective techniques.
Wagner EE; Alexander RA; Roos G; Prospero MK
J Pers Assess; 1985 Dec; 49(6):579-81. PubMed ID: 3912484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of the standardized interview for the evaluation of psychopathology.
Endicott J; Spitzer RL
J Pers Assess; 1972 Oct; 36(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 4561481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship of distortion to DAP diagnostic accuracy among psychologists at three levels of sophistication.
Watson CG
J Consult Psychol; 1967 Apr; 31(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 5342733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Eisegesis and assessment.
Dana RH
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Jun; 30(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 5329104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychologists' judgments regarding prognosis for classifications of 15 functional psychotic disorders.
Stone LA; James RL
Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Dec; 21(3):893-4. PubMed ID: 5855938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration of information in a clinical judgment task, an empirical comparison of six models.
Nystedt L; Magnusson D
Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Apr; 40(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 1178294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artistic quality of drawings and judges' evaluations of the DAP.
Cressen R
J Pers Assess; 1975 Apr; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 1097630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do baseline client characteristics predict the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of schizophrenia?
Couture SM; Roberts DL; Penn DL; Cather C; Otto MW; Goff D
J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Jan; 194(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 16462549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Body disturbance and sexual elaboration factors in figure drawings of schizophrenic patients.
Carlson K; Quinlan D; Tucker G; Harrow M
J Pers Assess; 1973 Feb; 37(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 4571707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The usefulness of projective methods in the diagnosis of schizophrenia].
Drat-Ruszczak K
Psychiatr Pol; 1988; 22(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 3043507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
