189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 488951)
21. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis.
Monks SS
Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The ethics of informed consent: an overview.
Plaut EA
Psychiatr J Univ Ott; 1989 Sep; 14(3):435-8. PubMed ID: 2678183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The law of informed consent: from "doctor is right" to "patient has rights".
Kurtz SF
Syracuse Law Rev; 2000; 50(4):1243-60. PubMed ID: 16528861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Malpractice, informed consent, and the use of low osmolality contrast media.
Eisner JM; Casey BJ
Conn Med; 1988 Feb; 52(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 3278846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Informed consent in dental malpractice.
Assioun P
Dentistry; 1997 Apr; 17(2):20-1, 28-30. PubMed ID: 9485705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethics versus legal informed consent--a distinction with little difference.
Zinman EJ
J Hist Dent; 2007; 55(3):134-8; discussion 171-85. PubMed ID: 18380247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Informed consent: a changing standard of disclosure.
Eslami M
Conn Med; 1984 Jun; 48(6):407. PubMed ID: 11644146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Reverse informed consent: the unreasonably dangerous patient.
Oddi AS
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 46(6):1417-83. PubMed ID: 11659884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Modern status of views as to general measure of physician's duty to inform patient of risks of proposed treatment.
Frantz LB
Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 88():1008-44. PubMed ID: 12091933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Current status of the law of consent to treatment.
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1979 Feb; 53(3):83-5, 87. PubMed ID: 759316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Legal and ethical myths about informed consent.
Meisel A; Kuczewski M
Arch Intern Med; 1996 Dec 9-23; 156(22):2521-6. PubMed ID: 8951294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Legal liability for medical innovation.
Epstein RA
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1989 May; (123):7-27. PubMed ID: 10292879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Informed consent update for Louisiana. Reducing the risk of malpractice suits.
Palmisano DJ; Lauve R
J La State Med Soc; 1994 Sep; 146(9):399-401. PubMed ID: 7996036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent.
Halligan PD
LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Duty to disclose.
Borgaonkar DS
Am J Med Genet; 1992 Dec; 44(6):851-3. PubMed ID: 1481863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Informed consent.
Gerber P
Med J Aust; 1984 Jan; 140(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 6694587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
Picard EI
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas.
Cluff CA
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Strict liability and informed consent: "Don't say I didn't tell you so!
Maldonado JE
Akron Law Rev; 1976; 9(4):609-28. PubMed ID: 11664618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Doctors, defenses and the age of informed consent (second part).
Ashe L
Bol Asoc Med P R; 1973 Mar; 65(3):49-54. PubMed ID: 4532567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
