These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4890997)

  • 1. DAP: back against the wall?
    Hammer EF
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1969 Apr; 33(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 4890997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Actuarial, naive clinical, and sophisticated clinical prediction of pathology from figure drawings.
    Stricker G
    J Consult Psychol; 1967 Oct; 31(5):492-4. PubMed ID: 4864754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The status of projective techniques: or, "wishing won't make it go away".
    Piotrowski C
    J Clin Psychol; 1984 Nov; 40(6):1495-502. PubMed ID: 6392345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blind test interpretation to overcome student resistance to projective techniques courses.
    Rader GE; Schill TR
    J Pers Assess; 1973 Jun; 37(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 4575075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of clinical judgments based on human figure drawings.
    Wanderer ZW
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1969 Apr; 33(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 4890996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship of distortion to DAP diagnostic accuracy among psychologists at three levels of sophistication.
    Watson CG
    J Consult Psychol; 1967 Apr; 31(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 5342733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do projective techniques get a "bum rap" from clinical psychology training directors?
    Watkins CE
    J Pers Assess; 1994 Oct; 63(2):387-9. PubMed ID: 7965579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical psychologists' ratings of MAPS figures along a social withdrawal scale.
    Neuringer C
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1969 Feb; 33(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 4888060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of psychometric and projective tests in clinical psychology.
    BURTON A
    J Psychol; 1949 Oct; 28(2):451-6. PubMed ID: 18141111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new experimental approach to the relationship between color-shading and suicide attempts.
    Colson DB; Hurwitz BA
    J Pers Assess; 1973 Jun; 37(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 4575076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of personality and attitude: applications to clinical research.
    Marks I
    Postgrad Med J; 1968 Apr; 44(510):277-85. PubMed ID: 4385138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. USE OF MATCHING METHOD IN MEASURING RELIABILITY OF INDIVIDUAL CLINICIAN'S DIAGNOSTIC JUDGMENT.
    PHELAN JG
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Apr; 16():491-6. PubMed ID: 14285856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of an analysis of variance technique for investigating the differential diagnosis of organic versus functional involvement of symptoms.
    Millimet CR; Greenberg RP
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1973 Apr; 40(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 4694197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Critical evaluation of the less common projective and psychometric tests in the psychopathology of children].
    De Franco F
    Riv Sper Freniatr Med Leg Alien Ment; 1967 Dec; 91(6):1317-23. PubMed ID: 4896207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical psychologist-assistant approach to psychodiagnostic testing.
    Affleck DC; Strider FD; Helper MM
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Aug; 32(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 4877009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychodiagnostic training in the academic setting: past and present.
    Shemberg K; Keeley S
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1970 Apr; 34(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 4922565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective Draw-a-Person scales: an attempted cross-validation.
    Watson CG; Felling J; Maceachern DG
    J Clin Psychol; 1967 Jul; 23(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 4866661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trait judgment of photographs by neuropsychiatric patients.
    CHAMBERS JL
    J Clin Psychol; 1957 Oct; 13(4):393-6. PubMed ID: 13463147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The value of the standardized interview for the evaluation of psychopathology.
    Endicott J; Spitzer RL
    J Pers Assess; 1972 Oct; 36(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 4561481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Consequences of psychiatric diagnosis].
    Beckmann J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1973 Jun; 135(25):1303-8. PubMed ID: 4585747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.