These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 489186)
1. Patients, therapists, and third parties: the victimological virtues of Tarasoff. Wexler DB Int J Law Psychiatry; 1979; 2(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 489186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tarasoff: protective privilege versus public peril. Gurevitz H Am J Psychiatry; 1977 Mar; 134(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 842706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tarasoff and the clinician: problems in fulfilling the duty to protect. Appelbaum PS Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Apr; 142(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 3976915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tarasoff and the dilemma of the dangerous patient: new directions for the 1990's. Perlin ML Law Psychol Rev; 1992; 16():29-63. PubMed ID: 11659689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 6 Jul 1973. California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 Wests Calif Report; 1973; 108():878-901. PubMed ID: 11646032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tarasoff and the practice of psychotherapy. Goldstein RL Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Aug; 150(8):1278-9. PubMed ID: 8328592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tarasoff in the Canadian context: Wenden and the duty to protect. Truscott D; Crook KH Can J Psychiatry; 1993 Mar; 38(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 8467448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Law & Psychiatry. Appelbaum PS Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1981 Jan; 32(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 7461613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 1 Jul 1976. California. Supreme Court, In Bank Wests Calif Report; 1976; 131():14-42. PubMed ID: 11646056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Twenty years after Tarasoff: reviewing the duty to protect. Anfang SA; Appelbaum PS Harv Rev Psychiatry; 1996; 4(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 9384976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suits against clinicians for warning of patients' violence. Appelbaum PS Psychiatr Serv; 1996 Jul; 47(7):683-4. PubMed ID: 8807679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal issues in medical management of violent and threatening patients. Dickens BM Can J Psychiatry; 1986 Nov; 31(8):772-80. PubMed ID: 3791135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tarasoff at twenty-five. Herbert PB; Young KA J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 12108565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Tarasoff dilemma in criminal court. Leong GB; Eth S; Silva JA J Forensic Sci; 1991 May; 36(3):728-35. PubMed ID: 1856640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Untangling Tarasoff: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. Seligman BS Hastings Law J; 1977 Sep; 29(1):179-210. PubMed ID: 11661581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting third parties: a decade after Tarasoff. Mills MJ; Sullivan G; Eth S Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Jan; 144(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 3799843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The dangerous patient exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege: the Tarasoff duty and the Jaffee footnote. Harris GC Wash Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 74(1):33-68. PubMed ID: 11865923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. McIntosh v. Milano. 12 Jun 1979. New Jersey. Superior Court, Law Division Atl Report; 1979; 403():500-15. PubMed ID: 11645934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Confidentiality and the new duty to protect: the therapist's dilemma. Weinstock R Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1988 Jun; 39(6):607-9. PubMed ID: 3402920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]