These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4897672)
1. [A contact method of determining bacterial pollution of various surfaces]. Minkh AA Gig Sanit; 1969 Jun; 34(6):85-7. PubMed ID: 4897672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Agar-sausage method for determining bacterial contamination of surfaces. Gundstrup AS Health Lab Sci; 1968 Apr; 5(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 4869688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparative characteristics of methods for determining the bacterial contamination of the air]. Sokolinskiĭ LM; Maksimov VF Gig Sanit; 1984 Jun; (6):47-9. PubMed ID: 6381239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [A method for detection of bacterial species in water]. Kotenok IaF Gig Sanit; 1993 Mar; (3):67-9. PubMed ID: 8063138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Method of determination of general air contamination by microbes]. Kotenok IaF; Gavrilov OG Gig Sanit; 1993 May; (5):71-2. PubMed ID: 8063178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Method of determining the bacterial count in water reservoir sediments]. Romanenko VI; Romanenko VA Mikrobiologiia; 1971; 40(5):912-5. PubMed ID: 4942880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Description of a simple method for the bacteriological examination of urine. Preliminary note]. Avantey S; Stevenin F; Ceol A; Saggiorato R Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1980 Jun; 16(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 7017797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Method of isolation of a hemoculture]. Otova TA Lab Delo; 1968; 2():103-5. PubMed ID: 4185783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Bacteriological sampling of surfaces: importance of the step of enrichment and the choice of the culture media]. Meunier O; Hernandez C; Piroird M; Heilig R; Steinbach D; Freyd A Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 16230282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three bacterial count methods between laboratories. Barzaghi D; Bonomi E; Cafiero M; Carazzone M; Genova R; Giglioli N; Neri G; Veronese M Boll Chim Farm; 1980 May; 119(5):309-13. PubMed ID: 6779826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of pathogenic bacteria in blood cultures: comparison between conventional and PCR methods. Pechorsky A; Nitzan Y; Lazarovitch T J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Sep; 78(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 19616588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Quantitative investigations of the bacterial germ content of the sedimentation dust in two pig fattening houses (author's transl)]. Ackemann HH Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1980 Sep; 87(9):335-8. PubMed ID: 7006992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Quantitative bacteriological method for diagnosis of urinary tract infections]. Popović Z; Gojak Z Med Arh; 1971; 25(3):19-24. PubMed ID: 4950162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of quantitative bacterial cultures of the urine--a proposal of 0.05 ml smear method]. Kudo H; Sato S; Goto S; Ishitoya Y Rinsho Byori; 1970 Jul; 18(7):524-8. PubMed ID: 4989929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Quantitative determination of the soil microflora with the Kock method. 3. Effect of various culture media on the total bacterial count]. Singh-Verma SB Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg; 1968; 122(5):457-85. PubMed ID: 4900459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Then and now: use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories. Woo PC; Lau SK; Teng JL; Tse H; Yuen KY Clin Microbiol Infect; 2008 Oct; 14(10):908-34. PubMed ID: 18828852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different culture methods on bacterial recovery in hemodialysis fluids. Punakabutra N; Nunthapisud P; Pisitkun T; Tiranathanagul K; Tungsanga K; Eiam-Ong S J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Nov; 87(11):1361-7. PubMed ID: 15825714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]