These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4900728)

  • 1. [Factors influencing dimensional accuracy of indirect working model. A method with an alginate impression material].
    Noda T
    Shigaku; 1969 Sep; 57(2):181-99. PubMed ID: 4900728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Studies on the use of alginate impression material and the dependence of the impression result on various conditions of processing. 3. Dimensional accuracy].
    Welker D
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Jun; 24(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 4605968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical evaluation of the agar alginate combined impression: dimensional accuracy of dies by new master crown technique.
    Ratnaweera PM; Yoshida K; Miura H; Kohta A; Tsuchihira K
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Sep; 50(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 15074361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [How to get stable models with agar-alginate combination materials].
    Unemori M; Matsuya Y; Hayashi R; Yamamoto Y; Matono R
    Shikai Tenbo; 1980 Mar; 55(3):455-63. PubMed ID: 6995169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Studies on dimensional accuracy of indirect working model in fixed partial dentures--laminated reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression method (author's transl)].
    Yawata S
    Shigaku; 1978 Apr; 65(6):1074-85. PubMed ID: 397426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions.
    Alcan T; Ceylanoğlu C; Baysal B
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 19123710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dimensional accuracy of partially edentulous arch in relation to impression material].
    Biffar R; Pfaller I
    Quintessenz; 1990 Jun; 41(6):1047-55. PubMed ID: 2204087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A historical review of hydrocolloids and an investigation of the dimensional accuracy of the new alginates for crown and bridge impressions when using stock trays.
    Hansson O; Eklund J
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(2):81-95. PubMed ID: 6377548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two- and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: effects of storage time and moisture contamination.
    Chandran DT; Jagger DC; Jagger RG; Barbour ME
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2010; 20(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 21084736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids.
    Sedda M; Casarotto A; Raustia A; Borracchini A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 18473028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distortion of the alginate impression.
    Cragg ED
    Can Forces Dent Serv Q; 1978; 19(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 380791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Studies on the use of alginate impression material and the dependence of the results on various processing conditions. 1. Problems of processing; comparative testing of various measuring methods].
    Welker D
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Apr; 24(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 4599731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Angle reproducibility and surface roughness of stone casts obtained from combined agar-alginate impressions].
    Ohta T
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 May; 9(3):401-11. PubMed ID: 2135530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working times of elastomeric impression materials determined by dimensional accuracy.
    Tan E; Chai J; Wozniak WT
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 8639243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alginate impressions and study models.
    Baum L; Sponzo MT
    J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1979; 53(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 118195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die.
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M
    Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Agar-alginate continuous impression taking].
    Someya S
    Hotetsu Rinsho; 1983; 16(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 6371769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.