These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4902352)
1. Normal values in medicine. Mainland D Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1969 Sep; 161(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 4902352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Standardized interpretation of laboratory data. Gabrieli ER Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1969 Sep; 161(2):460-76. PubMed ID: 4902351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A computer program for estimation of reference percentile values in laboratory data. Rossing RG; Hatcher WE Comput Programs Biomed; 1979 Jan; 9(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 365438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why not use the standard deviation index as a common scale for data quantification? Niwa M Clin Chem; 1987 Jul; 33(7):1294. PubMed ID: 3594891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Goals for allowable analytic error better based on medical usefulness criteria. Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Mar; 85(3):391-2. PubMed ID: 3751987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health, normality, and the ghost of Gauss. Elveback LR; Guillier CL; Keating FR JAMA; 1970 Jan; 211(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 5466893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of variance, control charts, and the clinical laboratory. A system of quality control. Amenta JS Am J Clin Pathol; 1968 Jun; 49(6):842-9. PubMed ID: 5654513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality control by the reference sample method. Error detection as a function of the variability of the control data. Amador E Am J Clin Pathol; 1968 Sep; 50(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 5676335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship of intralaboratory bias and imprecision on laboratories' ability to meet medical usefulness limits. Ehrmeyer SS; Laessig RH Am J Clin Pathol; 1988 Jan; 89(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 3337048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Some nonparametric statistical tests for quick evaluation of clinical data. Gindler EM Clin Chem; 1975 Mar; 21(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 1112039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The coefficient of analysis, a new figure of merit for laboratory performance. Louderback AL; Szatkowski PR Clin Chem; 1980 May; 26(6):774-5. PubMed ID: 7371158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory data analysis system. 3. Multivariate normality. Grams RR; Johnson EA; Benson ES Am J Clin Pathol; 1972 Aug; 58(2):188-200. PubMed ID: 4558598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory data analysis system. II. Analytic error limits. Grams RR; Johnson EA; Benson ES Am J Clin Pathol; 1972 Aug; 58(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 4558597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patterns and clusters--multivariate approach for interpreting clinical chemistry results. Winkel P Clin Chem; 1973 Dec; 19(12):1329-38. PubMed ID: 4585803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]