These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4905455)

  • 41. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants.
    Cabral LM; Guedes CG
    Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 17563509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A technique to verify or correct analogue position and soft tissue profile on an implant working cast.
    Vitale ND; Tung F; Goldstein G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 19703619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of tissue conditioners upon the surface hardness of dental stone and improved dental stone.
    Panagiotouni E; Pissiotis A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Dec; 2(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7920395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques.
    Shah S; Sundaram G; Bartlett D; Sherriff M
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 15476960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A simple, cost-effective method of denture duplication.
    Massad JJ; Connelly ME; Davis WJ
    Dent Today; 2000 May; 19(5):62-9. PubMed ID: 12524762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings.
    Dumbrigue HB; Gurun DC; Javid NS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Scanning electron microscopy in clinical dental research. Impression technic: rapid-mirror-araldite method (RMA method)].
    Fischlschweiger W
    Phillip J Restaur Zahnmed; 1984; 1(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 6100697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Impressions and models in restorative dentistry and dental technology (II)].
    Buhler U; Zimmermann W
    Quintessenz J; 1982 Jun; 12(6):575-85. PubMed ID: 6764545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [From impression to model].
    Franz G
    Quintessenz Zahntech; 1980 Aug; 6(8):107-14. PubMed ID: 7043599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fabrication of a custom impression tray using a thermoplastic material as the tray spacer.
    Barrero C; Purdy M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):406-7. PubMed ID: 16198183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Immediate dies for in-office indirect resin restorations.
    Beggs RJ
    Dent Today; 2000 Sep; 19(9):144-9. PubMed ID: 12524736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impression procedures and construction of a sectional denture for a patient with microstomia: a clinical report.
    Geckili O; Cilingir A; Bilgin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):387-90. PubMed ID: 17174654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reversible-irreversible hydrocolloid impressions for composite onlays.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2005 Dec; 24(12):56, 58-61; quiz 61. PubMed ID: 16396160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Locating angulated abutments: a technical note.
    Coward TJ; Watson RM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(1):82-3. PubMed ID: 9048458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Time-saving method for the fabrication of a definitive cast for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Daher T; Meserkhani PV; Baba NZ; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 17631175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An innovation in implant template design allows more accuracy during placement.
    Hazbun J
    Dent Implantol Update; 1998 Mar; 9(3):22-3. PubMed ID: 9555249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.