These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4907228)

  • 1. Performance of the computer and physician in the analysis of the electrocardiogram.
    Caceres CA; Hochberg HM
    Am Heart J; 1970 Apr; 79(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 4907228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of a 15-lead hybrid computer-aided electrocardiographic system.
    Talbot S; Dreifus LS; Watanabe Y; Reich M; Chiang R; Morris K
    Eur J Cardiol; 1973 Sep; 1(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 4618198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Letter: Evaluating computer ECG programs.
    Pipberger HV; Cornfield J
    Circulation; 1974 Dec; 50(6):1287-8. PubMed ID: 4279148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A comparative investigation of the clinical value of an ECG-computer analysis (author's transl)].
    Enenkel W; Spiel R; Kiss E
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Oct; 86(18):523-7. PubMed ID: 4277767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer analysis of the electrocardiogram: evaluation of experience in a hospital heart station.
    Gorman PA; Evans JM
    Am Heart J; 1970 Oct; 80(4):515-21. PubMed ID: 4919299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. V. Suggested standards for instrumentation in computer processing of electrocardiograms.
    Sherwood JD
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1259-61. PubMed ID: 4574249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does a computer-based ECG-recorder interpret electrocardiograms more efficiently than physicians?
    Jakobsson A; Ohlin P; Pahlm O
    Clin Physiol; 1985 Oct; 5(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 3902333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer interpretation of electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms.
    Enderle J; Telerman M; Pordy L; Chesky K; Jaffe H
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():194-202. PubMed ID: 775912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of the computer as a screening tool for routine electrocardiograms.
    Verdesca AS
    J Occup Med; 1972 Apr; 14(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 4553521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multigroup diagnosis of electrocardiograms.
    Cornfield J; Dunn RA; Batchlor CD; Pipberger HV
    Comput Biomed Res; 1973 Feb; 6(1):97-120. PubMed ID: 4266618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Initial experimental phase of the routine use of the program of Pordy and collaborators for the automatic analysis of electrocardiograms].
    Cavalca L
    Minerva Med; 1971 Nov; 62(88):4369-77. PubMed ID: 4945339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of computerized electrocardiographic interpretations in a community hospital.
    Pryor WW; Blackhurst DW; Gates K; Wagner GS
    J S C Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 91(3):105-11. PubMed ID: 7739204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Automatic diagnosis in phonocardiography (clinical medicine)].
    Yoshimura S; Shimoji E; Kodaira K
    Naika; 1971; 28(2):204-14. PubMed ID: 4937072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editorial: Computer analysis of the electrocardiogram.
    Bertrand CA
    Am J Cardiol; 1976 Sep; 38(3):394-5. PubMed ID: 785998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary prevention of rheumatic fever in Jerusalem schoolchildren. 3. Screening for heart disease by means of the PhonoCardioScan.
    Halfon ST; Brand-Auraban A; Szabo AM; Rogel S; Perez A; Ever-Hadani P; Davies AM
    Isr J Med Sci; 1970; 6(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 4923402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and normal variations of computer analysis of Frank electrocardiogram by Smith-Hyde program (1968 version).
    Bruce RA; Yarnall SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1972 Mar; 29(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 4551338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limitations of the computer in electrocardiographic interpretation.
    Caceres CA
    Am J Cardiol; 1976 Sep; 38(3):362-76. PubMed ID: 785997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A comparison of various computer programmes for analysing the electrocardiogram].
    Meyer J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1972 Apr; 97(14):552-9. PubMed ID: 4112250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic variability of different ECG programs.
    Arabin G; Dudeck J; Höbel W; Valk HU
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():190-3. PubMed ID: 775911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic reliability of ECG processing by multivariate analysis.
    Brohet C; Richman HG
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():209-13. PubMed ID: 132098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.