These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 490787)
1. Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer. Hicks MJ; Davis JR; Layton JM; Present AJ JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(19):2080-3. PubMed ID: 490787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in taiwan. Hou MF; Chuang HY; Ou-Yang F; Wang CY; Huang CL; Fan HM; Chuang CH; Wang JY; Hsieh JS; Liu GC; Huang TJ Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Apr; 28(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 12049952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages and limitations of physical examination and mammography in breast cancer screening. Feig SA; Schwartz GF Cancer Detect Prev; 1981; 4(1-4):553-63. PubMed ID: 7349821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. Warner E; Plewes DB; Hill KA; Causer PA; Zubovits JT; Jong RA; Cutrara MR; DeBoer G; Yaffe MJ; Messner SJ; Meschino WS; Piron CA; Narod SA JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(11):1317-25. PubMed ID: 15367553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. Crystal P; Strano SD; Shcharynski S; Koretz MJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 12818853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosis of early breast cancer. Homer MJ Am Fam Physician; 1981 Feb; 23(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 7457324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA; Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project. Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. Kuhl C; Weigel S; Schrading S; Arand B; Bieling H; König R; Tombach B; Leutner C; Rieber-Brambs A; Nordhoff D; Heindel W; Reiser M; Schild HH J Clin Oncol; 2010 Mar; 28(9):1450-7. PubMed ID: 20177029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia. Port ER; Park A; Borgen PI; Morris E; Montgomery LL Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1051-7. PubMed ID: 17206485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use and abuse of mammography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. Mahoney L; Csima A Can J Surg; 1983 May; 26(3):262-3, 265. PubMed ID: 6850440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group. Lynge E APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program experience: use of needle core biopsy in the diagnosis of screening-detected abnormalities. Caines JS; Chantziantoniou K; Wright BA; Konok GP; Iles SE; Bodurtha A; Zayid I; Daniels C Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 8539363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of breast cancer in an incident cancer population. Schmitt EL; Threatt B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 6611076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diaphanography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Drexler B; Davis JL; Schofield G Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 4034975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should we screen BRCA1 mutation carriers only with MRI? A multicenter study. Obdeijn IM; Winter-Warnars GA; Mann RM; Hooning MJ; Hunink MG; Tilanus-Linthorst MM Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Apr; 144(3):577-82. PubMed ID: 24567197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Temple LK; Wang EE; McLeod RS CMAJ; 1999 Oct; 161(8):1001-8. PubMed ID: 10551200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thermography, mammography, and clinical examination in breast cancer screening. Review of 16,000 studies. Feig SA; Shaber GS; Schwartz GF; Patchefsky A; Libshitz HI; Edeiken J; Nerlinger R; Curley RF; Wallace JD Radiology; 1977 Jan; 122(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 830320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]