These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4908613)
1. The preparation and properties of antisera to subcellular fractions from lymphocytes. Zola H; Mosedale B; Thomas D Transplantation; 1970 Mar; 9(3):259-72. PubMed ID: 4908613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Immunosuppressive potency of antiserum to thymus glands prepared with ribosomal fraction. Nagaya H; McKenzie WN; Kilburn KH; Sieker HO J Immunol; 1970 Feb; 104(2):511-3. PubMed ID: 4904884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of subcellular lymphocyte fractions to raise anti- lymphocyte serum. Lance EM; Ford P; Ruskziewicz M Fed Proc; 1970; 29(1):106-7. PubMed ID: 4904616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of antisera against thymocytes, lymphocytes and subcellular fractions in rats. Halbfass HJ; Paravicini D; Schäfer H; Michaelis W; Staib I Eur Surg Res; 1971; 3(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 4939353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the immunosuppressive effect of IgG and IgM fractions of rabbit anti-mouse thymocyte serum. Kurosawa T; Hirose Y; Fujii G Jpn J Exp Med; 1971 Aug; 41(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 4398267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of strain-specific effects in the immunosuppressive action of heterologous antithymus sera in mice. Shorter RG; Elveback LR Transplantation; 1970 Mar; 9(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 4908612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo antibody production by spleen cells after incubation in vitro with heterologous antilymphocyte plasma. Jeejeebhoy HF; Rabbat AG Nature; 1968 Dec; 220(5174):1350-2. PubMed ID: 4882918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Studies of immunosuppressive potency of rabbit antimouse antisera raised in response to various murine tissues. Sutthiwan P; Shorter RG; Hallenbeck GA J Surg Res; 1970 Apr; 10(4):151-7. PubMed ID: 4908685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human antilymphocytic serum. 1. Production and in-vitro testing. McKenzie IF; Morris PJ; Schiff P; de Gabriele G; Sutherland SK Med J Aust; 1969 Feb; 1(5):203-7. PubMed ID: 4976009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro detection of immunosuppressive activity of anti-lymphocyte sera. Bach JF; Antoine B Nature; 1968 Feb; 217(5129):658-9. PubMed ID: 5300099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of skin-sensitizing antibody to horse gamma-globulin by a horse antimouse thymocyte serum. Kind LS; Ako D Transplantation; 1971 May; 11(5):489-91. PubMed ID: 4932810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The immunosuppressive effect of antilymphocyte sera produced by sensitization with different lymphoid tissues. Sterling WA; Elveback LR; Shorter RG Transplantation; 1970 Oct; 10(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 4927385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Preparation of specific, potent antilymphocyte serum in the horse using dog thymocytes. Braf ZF; Smellie WA; Williams GM; Hume DM Surg Forum; 1967; 18():227-9. PubMed ID: 4866923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Immunosuppressive effects of antisera prepared with subcellular fractions of thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes. Nagaya H; McKenzie WN; Kilburn KH; Sieker HO Transplantation; 1971 Nov; 12(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 4948690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The biological activity of antisera raised against fractional antigens from murine thymocytes and lymphocytes. Hayes CR; Willard LF; Wilson RE Transplantation; 1970 Apr; 9(4):343-51. PubMed ID: 4101173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Preparation and in vitro assay of effective and ineffective antilymphocyte sera. Davis RC; Cooperband SR; Mannick JA Surgery; 1969 Jul; 66(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 4892313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The comparative immunosuppressive effects of heterologous antisera to various C3H mouse tissues. Sloboda AE; Landes J J Immunol; 1970 Jan; 104(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 4904000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]