These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4911976)

  • 1. The intelligibility of speech by hearing aids on inductance loop and microphone modes of signal reception.
    Vargo SW; Taylor G; Tannahill JC; Plummer SA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Mar; 13(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 4911976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of three classroom listening conditions on speech intelligibility.
    Ross M; Giolas TG
    Am Ann Deaf; 1971 Dec; 116(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 5132418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Electronics in the service of deaf South African children].
    Minerva Med; 1974 Nov; 65(85 Suppl):19-20. PubMed ID: 4444792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes.
    Tannahill JC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 6887805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A single-microphone-based self-adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation.
    Graupe D; Grosspietsch JK; Basseas SP
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 3430371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improvement in speech intelligibility in noise employing an adaptive filter with normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Brey RH; Robinette MS; Chabries DM; Christiansen RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):75-86. PubMed ID: 3430392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Schwander T; Levitt H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):87-92. PubMed ID: 3430393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal comparison of the benefits of cochlear implants and tactile aids in a controlled educational setting.
    Geers AE; Tobey EA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():328-9. PubMed ID: 7668691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction loop amp;ification systems: classroom performance.
    Matkin ND; Olsen WO
    ASHA; 1970 May; 12(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 5452663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early fitting of hearing aids and early education for the severely to profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Imai H
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1983; 29():199-208. PubMed ID: 6837372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of hearing-aid-processed stimuli in hearing aid evaluation.
    Harris FP; Hodgson WR
    Audiology; 1974; 13(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 4416819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM; Whalen HS; Overson GJ
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness.
    Villchur E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1973 Jun; 53(6):1646-57. PubMed ID: 4719256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of filtering on the intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.
    Neuman AC; Schwander TJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):127-34. PubMed ID: 3430372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loop induction system.
    Declan M Sister
    Am Ann Deaf; 1969 Mar; 114(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 4180604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech intelligibility enhancement using hearing-aid array processing.
    Saunders GH; Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1827-37. PubMed ID: 9301060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multimicrophone adaptive beamforming for interference reduction in hearing aids.
    Peterson PM; Durlach NI; Rabinowitz WM; Zurek PM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):103-10. PubMed ID: 3430369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech intelligibility differences across sound classes with in-the-ear and free-field microphones in quiet.
    Estis JM; Parisi JA; Moore RE; Brungart DS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Jun; 112(3):845-59. PubMed ID: 21853774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Our point of view on the problem of profound deafness in children].
    Del Bo M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1974; 28(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 4837366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Current technical and conceptual progress in hearing aids].
    Bosatra A
    Valsalva; 1971 Oct; 47(5):215-35. PubMed ID: 5146678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.