These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4915338)

  • 1. [Evaluation of free space allowance for Dietrich impression material in multiple impressions].
    Lombardo JG; Gabrielli F; Abbade Dde O
    Rev Fac Farm Odontol Araraquara; 1969; 3(2):149-83. PubMed ID: 4915338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Rapid polymerization technic for artificial crowns, inlays and impression materials].
    Heynold W
    Dent Labor (Munch); 1968 Apr; 16(4):187-8. PubMed ID: 4871815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impression procedures for restorative dentistry.
    Brown MH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1967 Mar; ():147-61. PubMed ID: 5334351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Calocryl c. p. g. as a material for taking impressions for cast inlays].
    Dachev B
    Stomatologiia (Sofiia); 1971; 53(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 5281426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The indirect unitary impressions].
    Brunel A; Charon ; Lakermance J; Lagarrigue JC; Leibowitch R
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1968 Dec; 69(8):677-89. PubMed ID: 4892656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A new impression material for the casting of individual gold restorations].
    Landt H
    Odontol Foren Tidskr; 1966 Dec; 30(4):295-318. PubMed ID: 5335043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The new silicon-rubber impression material "Xirux" in enlargement of prostheses and in indirect inlay-technic].
    Schneider W
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1965 Nov; 20(11):1226-7. PubMed ID: 5319780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variability in the shape of maxillary vestibular impressions recorded with modeling plastic and a polyether impression material.
    Tan HK; Hooper PM; Baergen CG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 8957865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reversible-irreversible hydrocolloid impressions for composite onlays.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2005 Dec; 24(12):56, 58-61; quiz 61. PubMed ID: 16396160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Impressions with silicones for the construction of metallic inlays].
    Zabotinsky AA
    Rev Esp Estomatol; 1966; 14(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 5219220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technique and materials for obtaining accurate impressions in 60 to 90 seconds.
    Werrin SR
    Dent Today; 2003 Mar; 22(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 12705017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptation of finger-smoothed irreversible hydrocolloid to impression surfaces.
    Lim PF; Neo KH; Sitoh L; Yeo KL; Stokes A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7575961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.