These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Cues for perception of synthetic and natural diphthongs in either noise or reverberation. Nábĕlek AK; Ovchinnikov A; Czyzewski Z; Crowley HJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Mar; 99(3):1742-53. PubMed ID: 8819863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visemes observed by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing adult viewers. Owens E; Blazek B J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 4046579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of consonantal context on vowel lipreading. Montgomery AA; Walden BE; Prosek RA J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 3560899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory pattern perception in the profoundly hearing impaired and lipreading of Dutch phonemes. van Son N; Bosman AJ; Lamoré PJ; Smoorenburg GF Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():111-23. PubMed ID: 8153557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual intelligibility of consonants: a lipreading screening test with implications for aural rehabilitation. Binnie CA; Jackson PL; Montgomery AA J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 Nov; 41(4):530-9. PubMed ID: 994484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustic analysis of monophthong and diphthong production in acquired severe to profound hearing loss. Palethorpe S; Watson CI; Barker R J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):1055-68. PubMed ID: 12942984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss. Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of stimulus duration on perception of Turkish vowels in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Kiliç MA; Yildirim I; Okur E; Oğüt F; Serbetçioğlu B Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):675-80. PubMed ID: 17118910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: further experiments with inexperienced observers. Reed CM; Doherty MJ; Braida LD; Durlach NI J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Jun; 25(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 7120961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory and visual cueing of the [+/- rounded] feature of vowels. Lisker L; Rossi M Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 4)():391-417. PubMed ID: 1339920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users. Donaldson GS; Kreft HA Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vowel processing during silent reading: evidence from eye movements. Ashby J; Treiman R; Kessler B; Rayner K J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):416-24. PubMed ID: 16569156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise. Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vowel change in Australian English. Cox F Phonetica; 1999; 56(1-2):1-27. PubMed ID: 10450073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Different phase-stable relationships of the upper lip and jaw for production of vowels and diphthongs. Shaiman S; Porter RJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Dec; 90(6):3000-7. PubMed ID: 1787240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]