These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4917701)

  • 41. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Variability in the shape of maxillary vestibular impressions recorded with modeling plastic and a polyether impression material.
    Tan HK; Hooper PM; Baergen CG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 8957865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accurate edentulous impressions.
    CAL; 1970 Apr; ():1-5. PubMed ID: 4911199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Comparative clinical and experimental study of mucodynamic molding with special reference to "Stafanat mittelfliessend" in the closed-mouth impression system].
    Berndt H; Musil R
    Stomatol DDR; 1980 Aug; 30(8):554-8. PubMed ID: 7008277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A technique to obtain stable centric occlusion records using impression plaster.
    Stamoulis K; Hatzikyriakos AE
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):406-8. PubMed ID: 17559527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An impression procedure for the mobile maxillary residual ridge.
    Newton JP; Quinn DM; Sturrock KC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1988; 1(3):245-7. PubMed ID: 3075908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.
    Drago CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 14508741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A temporary prosthesis for an edentulous patient following a maxillary resection.
    Ampil JP; Ellinger CW; Rahn AO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1967 Jan; 17(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 5333161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Studies on bite registration in the edentulous].
    Kühl W; Rossbach A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1968 Dec; 23(12):1393-6. PubMed ID: 4881818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Rough surface of plaster poured into alginate impression material].
    Nakamura K; Ogura H; Nakai A; Miyakawa Y; Goto S
    DE J Dent Eng; 1982; (62):19-24. PubMed ID: 6814835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Vibration during plaster pouring over impression material].
    Okazaki K
    DE J Dent Eng; 1983; (65):37-40. PubMed ID: 6409517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Study of the bone bases and the free space in resting position in the totally edentulous patient].
    Fourteau P; Ferran P; Lussac J
    Rev Odontostomatol Midi Fr; 1968; 26(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 4879267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Method of impression of edentulous maxillae].
    AASGAARD G
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1950 Nov; 60(9):424-6. PubMed ID: 14827301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Alternate technique for fabrication of a custom impression tray for definitive obturator construction.
    Oh WS; Roumanas E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):473-5. PubMed ID: 16765162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.
    Assunção WG; Cardoso A; Gomes EA; Tabata LF; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):641-7. PubMed ID: 19090889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Use of biofunctional prosthetic system following partial maxillary resection: a clinical report.
    Nekora-Azak A; Evlioglu G; Ozdemir-Karataş M; Keskin H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):693-5. PubMed ID: 16102083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Functional impressions under bite pressure in edentulous jaws].
    Vicuña LA
    Rev Circ Argent Odontol; 1968 Jul; 31(2):33-5. PubMed ID: 4879688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.