BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4920650)

  • 1. [Cholecysto-cholangiography with special reference to oral and intravenous methods].
    Shinoara S; Akazaki I
    Saishin Igaku; 1970 Nov; 25(11):2267-74. PubMed ID: 4920650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The combined use of oral cholecystopaque media and iodipamide.
    Goergen T; Goldberger LE; Berk RN
    Radiology; 1974 Jun; 111(3):543-8. PubMed ID: 4828985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of the results of oral cholecystography, infusion cholangiography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gallbladder calculi].
    Juszczyk Z; Jakubów H; Szydło W; Misiewicz C
    Wiad Lek; 1983 Sep; 36(18):1499-502. PubMed ID: 6666129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Problems related to the radiographic study of the biliary tract using oral or intravenous contrast media. Main side effects and biochemical changes induced by the administration of contrast media].
    Limido G
    Minerva Dietol Gastroenterol; 1984; 30(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 6374500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiology of the gallbladder and bile ducts.
    Berk RN
    Surg Clin North Am; 1973 Oct; 53(5):973-1005. PubMed ID: 4591878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent advances in clinical diagnostic radiology. 3. Contrast media.
    Amberg JR
    Adv Surg; 1971; 5():81-8. PubMed ID: 4941824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uricosuric action of cholecystographic agents. A possible factor in nephrotoxicity.
    Mudge GH
    N Engl J Med; 1971 Apr; 284(17):929-33. PubMed ID: 5551801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Physiological bases of oral cholecystography and intravenous cholangiography].
    Erlinger S
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56(8-9):575-8. PubMed ID: 1185694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cholecysto-cholangiography. Opacification by 2 routes. Statistics of 300 cases in 5 years without complications].
    Louant PH
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56 suppl 2():545-6. PubMed ID: 1232317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prospects of using modern x-ray contrast substances for intravenous cholegraphy (a review of the literature)].
    Sviridov NK
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1981; (6):78-81. PubMed ID: 7036516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cholecysto-cholangiography. 2. Comparative study of various radiographic methods].
    Nanbu M; Kobayashi N; Yamaguchi K; Namihisa T; Shirakabe H
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1972 Jan; 17(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 4482038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Recent triiodinated contrast media for oral cholecystocholangiography].
    Sviridov NK; Popova ZP; Varfolomeeva VN
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1985 Feb; 30(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 3155821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional oral cholecystography versus single-visit oral cholecystography.
    Nathan MH; Newman A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1981 Dec; 76(6):527-9. PubMed ID: 7331984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Pharmacokinetics of cholecysto-cholangiographic contrast media].
    Rosati G
    Radiol Med; 1970 Sep; 56(9):808-20. PubMed ID: 5210608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Our observations with infusion cholecysto-cholangiography].
    Gazdagh I; Erostyák M
    Orv Hetil; 1969 Jan; 110(2):77-8. PubMed ID: 5765074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The "nonvisualized" gallbladder. A tomographic re-evaluation.
    Meinick GS; Lo Curcio SB
    Radiology; 1973 Sep; 108(3):513-5. PubMed ID: 4723650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intravenous cholangiography. An experimental evaluation of several currently proposed methods.
    Moss AA; Nelson J; Amberg J
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1973 Feb; 117(2):406-11. PubMed ID: 4685870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative appraisal of different methods of contrasting the bile outflow system].
    Lisitsyn KM; Severova NS; Vorotnikova RP
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 1973 Dec; 111(12):32-4. PubMed ID: 4785818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Importance of intravenous cholegraphy. Cholecystography and cholangiography].
    Rasenack U; Laubenberger T
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1984 Dec; 109(50):1927-30. PubMed ID: 6150840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The evaluation of combined oral and intravenous cholecysto-cholangiography (author's transl)].
    Imoto T; Komaki S; Nishitani H; Ohno M; Onizuka H; Baba H; Matsuura K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Dec; 40(12):1119-27. PubMed ID: 7290913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.