These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 492248)
1. The decline of NIH's peer-review system? Hecht F N Engl J Med; 1979 Nov; 301(19):1068. PubMed ID: 492248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary. Rosensaft J Man Med; 1978; 3(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10316738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation. Himmelsbach CK; Sliwinski AJ; Lorber M; Mossman KL Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 10316736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomedical politics. Sex studies denounced, NIH's peer-review process defended. Kaiser J Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5647):966-7. PubMed ID: 14605337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Appropriations. House bill signals the end of NIH's double-digit growth. Kaiser J Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5628):2019. PubMed ID: 12829757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Gold out of lead? The NIH's new "financial management plan". Levine AS New Biol; 1991 Mar; 3(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 1878348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ASPB's response to the NIH's Public Access Policy. Raikhel NV; Ort D; Jorgensen R Plant Physiol; 2005 Jun; 138(2):540-1. PubMed ID: 15955908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stem cell lines. NIH's list of 64 leaves questions. Holden C Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5535):1567. PubMed ID: 11533448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying? Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. March-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act: the NIH's paper tiger? O'Brien W Seton Hall Law Rev; 2013 Nov; 43(4):1403-32. PubMed ID: 24308083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]