These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Factors that contribute to the willingness to try "street hypnosis". Davis OC; Gao X Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2014; 62(4):425-54. PubMed ID: 25084617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dreaming and hypnotic susceptibility: a pilot study. Gibson HB Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Apr; 60(2):387-94. PubMed ID: 4000851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Italian norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. De Pascalis V; Bellusci A; Russo PM Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2000 Jul; 48(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 10902296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phenomenological Experiences during Active-Alert Hypnosis: Kasos E; Kasos K; Kolto A; Józsa E; Varga K Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2020; 68(4):451-465. PubMed ID: 32815775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of time and gender on hungarian hypnotizability scores. Költő A; Gősi-Greguss AC; Varga K; Bányai EI Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2014; 62(1):84-110. PubMed ID: 24256481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oxytocin and cortisol in the hypnotic interaction. Varga K; Kekecs Z Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2014; 62(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 24256482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Paired-associate learning and recall of high and low imagery words: moderating effects of hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility level, and visualization abilities. Crawford HJ; Allen SN Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(3):353-72. PubMed ID: 8837407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: normative and comparative data. Bowers KS Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jan; 41(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 8425774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hypnotic susceptibility and the endogenous eyeblink: a brief communication. Lindsay S; Kurtz RM; Stern JA Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Apr; 41(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 8468106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques. Szabó C Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 8335421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy of the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: form C. Moran TE; Kurtz RM; Strube MJ Am J Clin Hypn; 2002; 44(3-4):221-30. PubMed ID: 11799536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recurrence quantification analysis of electroencephalograph signals during standard tasks of Waterloo-Stanford group scale of hypnotic susceptibility. Yargholi E; Nasrabadi AM J Med Eng Technol; 2015 Jan; 39(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25367766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expectancy versus absorption in the prediction of hypnotic responding. Council JR; Kirsch I; Hafner LP J Pers Soc Psychol; 1986 Jan; 50(1):182-9. PubMed ID: 3701572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A multivariate approach to the prediction of hypnotic susceptibility. Dixon M; Labelle L; Laurence JR Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1996 Jul; 44(3):250-64. PubMed ID: 8690536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]