These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4930636)

  • 1. Accuracy of indirect stone models made from reversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Nakazato M; Fusayama T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1971 Mar; 18(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 4930636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The shaping behavior of IMPRESSION MATERIALS in experiment and practice].
    Schwickerath VH
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1976 Sep; 31(9):680-4. PubMed ID: 782849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Influences of hardness of heavy-body-type silicone impression materials on dimensional accuracy of stone dies].
    Nakamura Y
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1986 Sep; 12(3):343-66. PubMed ID: 3333101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of the type and technique used for impression making on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Habib AN; Shehata MT
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1409-16. PubMed ID: 9497690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions with sodium hypochlorite. Part II: Effect on gypsum.
    Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Schwartz RS; Reagan SE; Koeppen RG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 7993542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reversible-irreversible hydrocolloid impressions for composite onlays.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2005 Dec; 24(12):56, 58-61; quiz 61. PubMed ID: 16396160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids.
    Sedda M; Casarotto A; Raustia A; Borracchini A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 18473028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation of finger-smoothed irreversible hydrocolloid to impression surfaces.
    Lim PF; Neo KH; Sitoh L; Yeo KL; Stokes A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7575961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dimensional accuracy of 3 silicone dental impression materials.
    Hassan AK
    East Mediterr Health J; 2006 Sep; 12(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 17333804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some effects of disinfecting solutions on the properties of alginate impression material and dental stone.
    Boden J; Likeman P; Clark R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001; 9(3-4):131-5. PubMed ID: 12192949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Accuracy of the indirect stone models made from reversible hydrocolloid].
    Nakazato M
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1969 Jun; 36(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 4896129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of tissue conditioners upon the surface hardness of dental stone and improved dental stone.
    Panagiotouni E; Pissiotis A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Dec; 2(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7920395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experimental studies on various model materials. 2. Comparative studies on hardness and abrasion].
    Bernau R; Meyer B; Moritz T
    Stomatol DDR; 1979 Jun; 29(6):427-33. PubMed ID: 291188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.