These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 493499)

  • 1. Evaluation of several sensitometers for use in processing quality assurance.
    Goldman LW; Watkins RT
    Radiol Technol; 1979; 50(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 493499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [PC-assisted network for quality control in film development].
    Buchberger W; Giacomuzzi SM; Springer P
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 9081409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Checking the consistency of sensitometers and film processors in a mammographic screening programme.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):143-7. PubMed ID: 8785642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using light sensitometry to evaluate mammography film performance.
    West MS; Spelic DC
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):854-60. PubMed ID: 10841387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Acceptance test of film processing in roentgen diagnosis].
    Hoeschen D; Buhr E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):203-5. PubMed ID: 8924456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitometric responses of selected medical radiographic films.
    Kofler JM; Gray JE
    Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):879-83. PubMed ID: 1947114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Densitometers and sensitometers in QC.
    Groenendyk DJ
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(4):249-50. PubMed ID: 8190892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quality assurance through constancy control for x-ray film processors (author's transl)].
    Weberling R
    Rontgenblatter; 1982 Jun; 35(6):248-54. PubMed ID: 7089438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of five methods for monitoring the precision of automated x-ray film processors.
    Nickoloff EL; Leo F; Reese M
    Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):509-14. PubMed ID: 704868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitometry necessity.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank RT
    Radiol Technol; 1986; 57(5):442-3. PubMed ID: 3715016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of light and x-ray sensitometric responses of double-emulsion films for different processing conditions.
    Blendl C; Buhr E
    Med Phys; 2001 Dec; 28(12):2420-6. PubMed ID: 11797944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiologic quality control and servicing.
    Health Devices; 1992; 21(6-7):188-230. PubMed ID: 1639624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of pH monitoring as a method of processor control.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Winkler NT
    Radiol Technol; 1979; 50(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 37551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality control for automated film processing.
    Faix CD; Van Tuinen R; Kereiakes JG
    Radiol Technol; 1973; 44(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 4685487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance: 2. The image receptor, the darkroom and processing.
    Horner K
    Dent Update; 1992 Apr; 19(3):120, 122-4, 126. PubMed ID: 1291369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitometry: the professional's test tool.
    McKinney WE
    Radiol Technol; 1996; 67(6):477-8. PubMed ID: 8827815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noninvasive electronic quality control devices for X-ray generator testing.
    Health Devices; 1992 Dec; 21(12):446-8. PubMed ID: 1490860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality index of radiological devices: results of one year of use.
    Tofani A; Imbordino P; Lecci A; Bonannini C; Del Corona A; Pizzi S
    Radiol Med; 2003; 105(5-6):490-9. PubMed ID: 12949460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.