These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4940403)

  • 1. Accuracy of a mercaptan rubber impression technique using a stock tray.
    Podshadley AG; Dilts WE; Neiman R; Sawyer HF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1971 Dec; 83(6):1303-8. PubMed ID: 4940403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic stresses encountered in impression removal.
    Collard EW; Caputo AA; Standlee JP; Trabert KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 May; 29(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 4574811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reline technic for mercaptan rubber impressions.
    Gullett CE; Podshadley AG
    Oper Dent; 1978; 3(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 397481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost analysis of relined mercaptan rubber impressions.
    Gullett CE; Podshadley AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Aug; 42(2):180-2. PubMed ID: 379319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of pouring mercaptan rubber impressions at various intervals after separation.
    Podshadley AG; Birtles JT; Neiman R; Dilts WE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Jul; 28(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 4556032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of silver plated mercaptan rubber impressions.
    Podshadley AG; Neiman R
    J Ky Dent Assoc; 1973 Apr; 25(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 4514896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in-vitro evaluation of setting time of mercaptan rubber.
    Sawyer HF; Podshadley AG; Dilts WE; Neiman R
    J Ky Dent Assoc; 1971 Oct; 23(4):17-21. PubMed ID: 5287767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of correcting a defective rubber-base impression.
    Shevlin GP; Schmidt JR; Harrison JD; Potts TV
    J Prosthet Dent; 1970 Jun; 23(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 4911060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of stone dies made from rubber impression materials.
    Stackhouse JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1970 Oct; 24(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 5272351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate denture impression technique using zinc-oxide and eugenol and rubber base impression material.
    Chaney SA
    Dent J; 1977 Mar; 43(3):130-1. PubMed ID: 323026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a rubber-base impression material.
    Gunther G; Welsh SI
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Jan; 39(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 340664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of casts produced from seven rubber impression materials.
    Sawyer HF; Birtles JT; Neiman R; Podshadley AG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1973 Jul; 87(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 4513361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of relined mercaptan-rubber impressions.
    Podshadley AG; Dilts WE; Neiman R; Ellison E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1970 Nov; 24(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 5273653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elasticity of impression materials: IV. Permanent deformation as a function of time.
    Kaloyannides TM; Christidou L
    J Dent Res; 1975; 54(1):168-73. PubMed ID: 1053758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [EXPERIMENTAL COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE DIMENSIONAL STABILITY OF 4 GROUPS OF DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS].
    BACHMANN J
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1965 Apr; 75():434-73. PubMed ID: 14280767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dimensional stability of a rubber impression material. The effect of storage time prior to pouring of the stone die.
    Bergman B; Olsson KA; Stenberg T
    Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1972 Nov; 65(11):559-68. PubMed ID: 4517212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
    Mishra S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.