These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 49414)

  • 1. Marginal adaptation of composite resins.
    Al-Hamadani KK; Crabb HS
    J Oral Rehabil; 1975 Jan; 2(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 49414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observations on a composite resin for class II restorations: two-year report.
    Phillips RW; Avery DR; Mehra R; Swartz ML; McCune RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Aug; 28(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 4504300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations.
    Eidelman E; Holan G; Tanzer-Sarneh S; Chosack A
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 2216907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: three-year report.
    Phillips RW; Avery DR; Mehra R; Swartz ML; McCune RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 Dec; 30(6):891-7. PubMed ID: 4519428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One-year observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations.
    Phillips RW; Avery DR; Mehra R; Swartz ML; McCune RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1971 Jul; 26(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 5281472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal fracture of posterior composite resins.
    Fukushima M; Setcos JC; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 3066806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An assessment of anterior restorations in vivo using the scanning electron microscope. Results after one year.
    Tay WM; Waite IM; Morrant GA; Borlace HR; Bultitude FW
    Br Dent J; 1974 Dec; 137(12):463-71. PubMed ID: 4531311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronal microleakage of temporary restorations in previously restored teeth with amalgam and composite.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtasli MB; Ozdemir S
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15986953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro microleakage of dental restorations.
    McCurdy CR; Swartz ML; Phillips RW; Rhodes BF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Mar; 88(3):592-602. PubMed ID: 4204384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.
    Khvostenko D; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 26621028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A microscopic investigation of the adaptation of some plastic filling materials to dental cavity walls.
    Asmussen E; Jorgensen KD
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1972 Mar; 30(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 4504437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal micromorphological 15-year results of posterior composite restorations using three-dimensional scanning electron microscopy.
    Dietz W; Montag R; Kraft U; Walther M; Sigusch BW; Gaengler P
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):959-69. PubMed ID: 24814136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of pre- and postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of amalgam and composite restorations.
    Ulukapi H; Benderli Y; Ulukapi I
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 12946068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of different techniques to assess marginal defects of Class II restorations in retrieved primary molars: a visual-tactile, SEM, dye penetration and polarized light microscopy study.
    Fuks AB; Araujo FB; Donly KJ; Cervantes M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2002 Oct; 19(4):6-16, 67. PubMed ID: 12510251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Margin quality and microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Lui JL; Masutani S; Setcos JC; Lutz F; Swartz ML; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Jan; 114(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 3468167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Liu JK; Chang CH; Shieh DB
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 15195731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical comparison of composite, amalgam, and silicate restorations.
    Eames WB; Strain JD; Weitman RT; Williams AK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Nov; 89(5):1111-7. PubMed ID: 4529964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.