These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63. An implant-supported, cobalt-chromium milled bar and nonflanged attachment-retained overdenture to rehabilitate the edentulous mandible. Lowe LG; Shcherbukhin VM J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 19573689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Cast metal bases as an economical alternative for the severely resorbed mandible. Rueda L; Wong F; Cooper M; Clark A Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):e63-6. PubMed ID: 21903510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. An evaluation of early bone changes after the insertion of mental endosseous implants into the jaws of rhesus monkeys. Armitage J; Natiella J; Greene G; Meenaghan M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1971 Oct; 32(4):558-68. PubMed ID: 4999108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Mandibular posterior blade implants. A twelve year clinical and statistical evaluation. Ferrer F; Castillo J; Rodríguez H; Guzmán J; Korchin L; Cabañas R Rev Odontol P R; 1986; 23(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 3551010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. The importance of dental implants. Misch CE Gen Dent; 2001; 49(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12004675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Laboratory requirements for the construction of subperiosteal Vitallium implants. Bausch E J Oral Implant Transplant Surg; 1966; 12():9-11. PubMed ID: 5227837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures. Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Reconstruction of the edentulous mandible. Babbush CA Int Dent J; 1985 Dec; 35(4):266-76. PubMed ID: 3912328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. An analysis and management of fractured implants: a clinical report. Balshi TJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(5):660-6. PubMed ID: 8908866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Successful tooth implants and the polymer implant concept. Hodosh M; Shklar G; Povar M Trans Int Conf Endod; 1973; 5(0):45-59. PubMed ID: 4526987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. New method for alveolar ridge augmentation. Leak DL; Kent JN; LaVelle W J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1973 Dec; 1(6):50-2. PubMed ID: 4272451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments. Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Tissue reactions to polymer-coated Vitallium pin implants. Shklar G; Hodosh M; Povar M J Prosthet Dent; 1970 Dec; 24(6):636-45. PubMed ID: 4991130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Construction techniques for blade and anchor implants. Cranin AN; Dennison TA J Am Dent Assoc; 1971 Oct; 83(4):833-9. PubMed ID: 4943493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]