These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Use of acid etchant on fresh preparations to improve definition of impressions and remove temporary cement. II. Ibsen RL J Acad Gen Dent; 1973 Jan; 21(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 4568809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. An alternative immediate complete denture impression technique. Goldstein GR J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jun; 67(6):892-3. PubMed ID: 1403888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Studies on extension of lower complete denture]. Rösel W Dtsch Stomatol; 1973 Nov; 23(11):868-77. PubMed ID: 4591553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy and dimensional stability of four interocclusal recording materials. Balthazar-Hart Y; Sandrik JL; Malone WF; Mazur B; Hart T J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jun; 45(6):586-91. PubMed ID: 6941014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reproducibility of the border outline of working impressions of the edentulous mandible obtained by the Slack-Herbst method. Krysinski Z; Prylinski M J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1986 Jun; 28(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 3531429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Council approves American Dental Association specification No. 16 for impression paste--zinc oxide-eugenol type. J Am Dent Assoc; 1961 Jul; 63():164-7. PubMed ID: 14447642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [How to take impressions of the lower jaw]. Fukamizu K; Moriya Y Hotetsu Rinsho; 1985; 18(2):213-30. PubMed ID: 3903723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A functional impression technique for the unsuccessful mandibular denture. Thomas CJ J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1978 Jul; 33(7):397-9. PubMed ID: 393739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of biofunctional prosthetic system following partial maxillary resection: a clinical report. Nekora-Azak A; Evlioglu G; Ozdemir-Karataş M; Keskin H J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):693-5. PubMed ID: 16102083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Action of clove oil, eugenol, and zinc-oxide eugenol paste on the dental pulp within "in vitro" conditions]. Stojicević M; Dordević O; Kostić L; Madanović N; Karanović D Stomatol Glas Srb; 1980; 27(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 6935838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of two methods of removing zinc oxide-eugenol provisional cement residue from the internal surface of cast restorations. Mosharraf R; Soleimani B; Sanaee-Nasab M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):27-34. PubMed ID: 19430623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. COUNCIL ADOPTS CHANGES IN AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION SPECIFICATION NO. 16 FOR IMPRESSION PASTE-ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL TYPE. COUNCIL ON DENTAL RESEARCH. YRASTORZA JA J Am Dent Assoc; 1963 Dec; 67():927. PubMed ID: 14063227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. An alternative and simplified technique for the impression of completely edentulous ridges. Carreiro Ada F; de Torres EM; Souza AA; Ribeiro RF Gen Dent; 2008; 56(2):158-9. PubMed ID: 18348373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [An impression method for the entire lower prothesis]. van Willigen JD Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1965 Oct; 72(10):693-702. PubMed ID: 5320612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The healing of extraction wounds in the presence of foreign bodies (fragments of silver amalgam and of zinc oxide-eugenol impression paste). de Abreu EM; Vizioli MR; Valdrighi L Rev Fac Odontol Sao Jose Dos Campos; 1974; 3(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 4620792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]