These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Artefactual ST segment abnormalities due to electrocardiograph design. Tayler DI; Vincent R Br Heart J; 1985 Aug; 54(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 4015923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A portable device for measuring the characteristics of electrocardiographs]. Koltun VM; Trusov IuS Med Tekh; 1989; (4):55-9. PubMed ID: 2796693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination and standardization of basic parameters of electrocardiographs. Asnin EB Biomed Eng (NY); 1974 Nov; 8(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 4412747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Recommendations for safe current limits for electrocardiographs. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Electrocardiography, American Heart Association. Laks MM; Arzbaecher R; Bailey JJ; Geselowitz DB; Berson AS Circulation; 1996 Feb; 93(4):837-9. PubMed ID: 8641016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comments on "Special report: recommendations for safe current limits for electrocardiographs'. Levin M Circulation; 1997 Jan; 95(1):276-8. PubMed ID: 8994449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the diagnostic functionality of electrocardiographs currently used in Helsinki hospitals. Heinonen E J Clin Eng; 1987; 12(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10280991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marquette MAC VU 12-lead electrocardiographs. Health Devices; 1992 Nov; 21(11):426-7. PubMed ID: 1428897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Do we need a new standard for electrocardiographs? Gold RG Br Heart J; 1985 Aug; 54(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 4015922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Standardization of the resistance of grounded electrocardiographs with patient circuits ground-insulated to electrical cophase interferences from an external main]. Rybakov AM Med Tekh; 1977; (3):27-34. PubMed ID: 886948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative Study on Two ECG Standards]. Yang Y; Wang B Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 41(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 29792663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A method for evaluating the main defects in electrocardiographs]. Parashin VB Med Tekh; 1972; 2():5-8. PubMed ID: 4649550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-channel electrocardiographs. J Med Eng Technol; 1984; 8(4):189-91. PubMed ID: 6527369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The "new" electrocardiographs. A step toward greater fidelity in recording. Pipberger HV Circulation; 1970 Nov; 42(5):771-2. PubMed ID: 5477249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. ECG artifact in the OR. Health Devices; 1991; 20(3-4):140-1. PubMed ID: 2037526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Giant pacemaker spikes. An electrocardiographic artifact. Peters RW; Kushner M; Knapp K Chest; 1985 Feb; 87(2):256-7. PubMed ID: 3967532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ECG artifact and defibrillator/monitors. Health Devices; 1991; 20(3-4):141. PubMed ID: 2037527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential misinterpretations related to artificial pacemaker signals generated by electrocardiographs. Littmann L; Farrell RM J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(4):717-20. PubMed ID: 25934509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]