These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4953700)

  • 41. Taste responses in ruminants. I. Reactions of sheep to sugars, saccharin, ethanol and salts.
    Goatcher WD; Church DC
    J Anim Sci; 1970 May; 30(5):777-83. PubMed ID: 5420312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sweet taste transduction in hamster taste cells: evidence for the role of cyclic nucleotides.
    Cummings TA; Powell J; Kinnamon SC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2326-36. PubMed ID: 8120585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Oxytocin decreases sweet taste sensitivity in mice.
    Sinclair MS; Perea-Martinez I; Abouyared M; St John SJ; Chaudhari N
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 141():103-10. PubMed ID: 25554481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Glucose and saccharin preference in alloxan diabetic rats.
    Kakolewski JW; Valenstein ES
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 May; 68(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 5793865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Discrimination of sucrose-taste by the rat as a potential bioassay for sweeteners.
    Lal H; Shearman GT; Cafaro MP
    Drug Nutr Interact; 1982; 1(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 6926820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Biosensor analysis of natural and artificial sweeteners in intact taste epithelium.
    Zhang F; Zhang Q; Zhang D; Lu Y; Liu Q; Wang P
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2014 Apr; 54():385-92. PubMed ID: 24292144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Acquisition of a conditioned taste aversion becomes context dependent when it is learned after extinction.
    Rosas JM; Callejas-Aguilera JE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jan; 60(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17162504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Taste-immunosuppression engram: reinforcement and extinction.
    Niemi MB; Härting M; Kou W; Del Rey A; Besedovsky HO; Schedlowski M; Pacheco-López G
    J Neuroimmunol; 2007 Aug; 188(1-2):74-9. PubMed ID: 17602756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sweeteners: consumer acceptance in tea.
    Sprowl DJ; Ehrcke LA
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1984 Sep; 84(9):1020-2. PubMed ID: 6470371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Human detectability thresholds for saccharin, sodium saccharin, and sodium chloride.
    Williams RA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1970 Jan; 70(1):113-5. PubMed ID: 5434820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Saccharin as a sugar surrogate revisited.
    Smith JC; Sclafani A
    Appetite; 2002 Apr; 38(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 12027377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Gustatory thalamus lesions eliminate successive negative contrast in rats.
    Reilly S; Trifunovic R
    Behav Neurosci; 1999 Dec; 113(6):1242-8. PubMed ID: 10636302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Taste responses to sweet stimuli in alpha-gustducin knockout and wild-type mice.
    Danilova V; Damak S; Margolskee RF; Hellekant G
    Chem Senses; 2006 Jul; 31(6):573-80. PubMed ID: 16740645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Repeated exposures to gustatory stimuli produce habituation or positive contrast effects in perinatal rats.
    Mickley GA; Kenmuir CL; Dengler-Crish CM; McMullen C; McConnell A; Valentine E
    Dev Psychobiol; 2004 Apr; 44(3):176-88. PubMed ID: 15054886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Analyses of drugs and chemicals by infrared absorption spectroscopy. XI. Determination of saccharin sodium, dulcin, and sodium cyclamate in their mixture by use of methanol and water as solvents].
    Oi N; Inaba E
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 1967 Jun; 87(6):640-2. PubMed ID: 5624819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Taste of saccharin as sufficient reward for performance.
    Dufour VL; Arnold MB
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Dec; 19(3):1293-4. PubMed ID: 5956428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. c-Fos induction in response to saccharin after taste aversion learning depends on conditioning method.
    Spray KJ; Halsell CB; Bernstein IL
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):225-7. PubMed ID: 10661518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. X-RAY-CONDITIONED SACCHARIN AVERSION INDUCED DURING THE IMMEDIATE POSTEXPOSURE PERIOD.
    MORRIS DD; SMITH JC
    Radiat Res; 1964 Apr; 21():513-9. PubMed ID: 14142182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Once is too much: conditioned changes in accumbens dopamine following a single saccharin-morphine pairing.
    Grigson PS; Hajnal A
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 121(6):1234-42. PubMed ID: 18085877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.