These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 495462)

  • 1. Interlaboratory comparison of blood lead determinations.
    Maher CC; Roettgers DM; Conlon HJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Mar; 40(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 495462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interlaboratory evaluation of the reliability of blood lead analyses.
    Keppler JK; Maxfield ME; Moss WD; Tietjen G; Linch AL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1970; 31(4):412-29. PubMed ID: 5473751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Interlaboratory quality control for the determination of blood lead. Initial experiences in Tuscany].
    Cicchella G; Baldoni V; Bandinelli R; Bavazzano P; Caldini G; Gori R
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1983 Sep; 19(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 6677929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Development of a method for determining lead blood levels with chronopotentiometry].
    Mathieu H; Le Moigne F; Panteix G; Derache P; Jouzier E
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2003; 61(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 14711607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. OSHA criteria for laboratory proficiency in blood lead analysis.
    Donadio RE
    Public Health Rep; 1982; 97(2):175-6. PubMed ID: 6278528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparable laboratory performances in the analysis of lead in control samples and in fresh human blood.
    Morisi G; Patriarca M; Taggi F
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1989; 25(3):417-22. PubMed ID: 2624353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
    Novis DA; Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critique of interlaboratory evaluation of the reliability of blood-lead analyses.
    Weil CS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1971 May; 32(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 5087577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The interlaboratorial quality assurance program for blood lead determination. An evaluation of methods and results.
    Morisi G; Patriarca M; Taggi F
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1989; 25(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 2624352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interlaboratory results for blood lead proficiency testing program in Thailand.
    Pidetcha P; Suwanthon L; Preechavuth A; Pusiri A; Tatt SC
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Dec; 82(12):1247-53. PubMed ID: 10659569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proficiency test performance and experience with College of American Pathologists' programs.
    Tholen D; Lawson NS; Cohen T; Gilmore B
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Apr; 119(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 7726724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods.
    Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.
    Augustin JC; Carlier V
    Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A statistical procedure for measuring and evaluating performance in interlaboratory comparison programs.
    Tholen DW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 3355349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical analysis of interlaboratory studies.
    Snee RD; Smith PE
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1972 Dec; 33(12):784-90. PubMed ID: 4662558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility and quality control in the analysis of biological samples for lead and mercury.
    Saltzman BE; Yeager DW; Meiners BG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Apr; 44(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 6858852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Proficiency testing for chemical analytical laboratories--general principles concerning organization and assessment of results].
    Ludwicki JK; Góralczyk K; Czaja K; Struciński P
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1995; 46(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 8533027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. French external quality assessment schemes for lead in blood and aluminum in plasma and dialysis water.
    Guillard O; Piriou A; Pineau A
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1996; 32(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 8913042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model for the statistical description of analytical errors occurring in clinical chemical laboratories with time.
    Hyvärinen A
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1985; 175():1-84. PubMed ID: 3858970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Biological monitoring of lead: system and quality control].
    Raźniewska G; Trzcinka-Ochocka M
    Med Pr; 1993; 44(6 Suppl 1):127-43. PubMed ID: 8159084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.