These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4965405)

  • 1. Cancer of the cervix: time interval in repeating a cytology smear.
    Anderson WA; Gunn SA
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1967; 17(4):150-6. PubMed ID: 4965405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency of cervical smear abnormalities within 3 years of normal cytology.
    Dyson RD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Dec; 96(6):1026. PubMed ID: 11203354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing the clinical utility of the cervical smear cytology report--a cytopathologist's recommendations.
    Malami SA; Adegbola TA; Mayun AA
    Niger J Med; 2003; 12(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 12956010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DIY smear tests: are they the answer to falling cervical screening rates?
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2019 Jan; 364():l361. PubMed ID: 30674464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Study of the hormonal function and diagnosis of uterine cancer cell by the vaginal smear].
    STRAETMANS R; VOKAER R
    Brux Med; 1948 Dec; 28(50):2635. PubMed ID: 18104689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
    Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of gel lubricant on cervical cytology.
    Charoenkwan K; Ninunanahaeminda K; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Thorner PS
    Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 19068667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology: perspective in the 1980s.
    Mitchell H; Medley G; Giles G
    BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6740):1622-6. PubMed ID: 2372641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should we abandon pap smear testing?
    DeMay RM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 114 Suppl():S48-51. PubMed ID: 11996169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does mild atypia on a cervical smear warrant further investigation?
    Walker EM; Dodgson J; Duncan ID
    Lancet; 1986 Sep; 2(8508):672-3. PubMed ID: 2876144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Significance of a positive Papanicolaou smear in a well screened population.
    Lyon DS; Kaminski PF; Wheelock JB
    South Med J; 1989 Feb; 82(2):190-2. PubMed ID: 2916145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Population screening for uterine cervix cancer: the negative effects of insufficient knowledge as to what is normal and abnormal].
    van der Graaf Y
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(34):1569-71. PubMed ID: 12224477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical cytology. Increased sensitivity with a second cervical smear.
    Luthy DA; Briggs RM; Buyco A; Eschenbach A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jun; 51(6):713-7. PubMed ID: 662251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cancer of the Cervix. Further studies of the patient-obtained vaginal irrigation smear.
    Anderson WA; Gunn SA
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1967; 17(3):102-4. PubMed ID: 4963051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening frequency and histologic type influence the efficacy of cervical cancer screening: A nationwide cohort study.
    Chiang YC; Chen YY; Hsieh SF; Chiang CJ; You SL; Cheng WF; Lai MS; Chen CA;
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 56(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 28805598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The doubtful, suspicious vaginal smear].
    NAUJOKS H
    Med Klin; 1960 Jun; 55():1152-4. PubMed ID: 13854080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
    Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The value of screening using cervicography in dysplasia and neoplasms of the uterine cervix].
    Coibion M; Guenier C; Miloiu A; Andry M; Bonnal JL; Nogaret JM
    Rev Med Brux; 1990; 11(1-2):16-20. PubMed ID: 2406832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Significance of the class III cervical smear.
    HALL JE; ROSEN IH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1960 Apr; 79():709-17. PubMed ID: 14399045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cytology: use and follow-up.
    Hurt WG
    J Fam Pract; 1978 Sep; 7(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 690590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.