These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 496715)

  • 1. Hearing aid evaluation for persons with postlingual hearing levels of 90 to 100 dB.
    Fujikawa S; Owens E
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1979 Nov; 105(11):662-5. PubMed ID: 496715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing aid evaluations for persons with total postlingual hearing loss.
    Fujikawa S; Owens E
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1978 Aug; 104(8):446-50. PubMed ID: 678191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 3950200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Hearing aid prescription in ENT practice. II. Forms of hearing aid construction and prescription of bilateral hearing aids].
    Seifert K
    HNO; 1987 May; 35(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 3610677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Hearing Handicap Scale as a measure of hearing aid benefit.
    Tannahill JC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1979 Feb; 44(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 423559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reactions to binaural hearing aid fitting.
    Markides A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():197-205. PubMed ID: 6955926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application and usage of tactile aid in Iran.
    Karimi-Yazdi A; Sazgar AA; Nadimi-Tehran A; Faramarzi A; Nassaj FE; Yahyavi S
    Arch Iran Med; 2006 Oct; 9(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 17061607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Late-onset auditory deprivation: effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids.
    Silman S; Gelfand SA; Silverman CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1357-62. PubMed ID: 6512097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical experience with the active middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Pok SM; Schlögel M; Böheim K
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 69():51-58. PubMed ID: 20610914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Stereophonic apparatus: our hearing aid test].
    Burdo S; Bassi G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1979; 33(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 495083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of 3 commonly used hearing aid circuits: A crossover trial. NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial Group.
    Larson VD; Williams DW; Henderson WG; Luethke LE; Beck LB; Noffsinger D; Wilson RH; Dobie RA; Haskell GB; Bratt GW; Shanks JE; Stelmachowicz P; Studebaker GA; Boysen AE; Donahue A; Canalis R; Fausti SA; Rappaport BZ
    JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(14):1806-13. PubMed ID: 11025833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K; Killion MC; Christensen LA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.