These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 496715)

  • 61. Photo guide. Sound advice about hearing aids.
    Lucas LJ; Matthews-Flint LJ
    Nursing; 2001 Feb; 31(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 11272946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Hearing-aids.
    Taylor LW
    Med J Aust; 1988 Jul; 149(1):56. PubMed ID: 3386577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Sentence reception abilities of hearing impaired students across five communication modes.
    Pudlas KA
    Am Ann Deaf; 1987 Jul; 132(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 3434524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The impact of hearing impairment on television viewing in the UK.
    Allen B
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Dec; 27(6):437. PubMed ID: 8054902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The laboratory versus the natural environment.
    Jerger J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 Oct; 15(9):1 p following table of contents. PubMed ID: 15575334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The usefulness of the binaural hearing aid.
    CARHART R
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1958 Feb; 23(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 13514791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Application of statistical methods in hearing aid investigations.
    Ramig PR; Engelberg MW
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 7429037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A comparison of two procedures for hearing-aid evaluation.
    SHORE I; KRAMER JC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1963 May; 28():159-70. PubMed ID: 13988661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Hearing aid evaluation.
    EWERTSEN HW
    AMA Arch Otolaryngol; 1956 Dec; 64(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 13381263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Some factors affecting the spondee threshold in normal-hearing subjects.
    TILLMAN TW; JERGER JF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1959 Jun; 2(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 13655302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Neural and behavioral changes after the use of hearing aids.
    Karawani H; Jenkins KA; Anderson S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Jun; 129(6):1254-1267. PubMed ID: 29677689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Hearing aid evaluation for persons with postlingual hearing levels of 90 to 100 dB.
    Fujikawa S; Owens E
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1979 Nov; 105(11):662-5. PubMed ID: 496715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Hearing aid evaluations for persons with total postlingual hearing loss.
    Fujikawa S; Owens E
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1978 Aug; 104(8):446-50. PubMed ID: 678191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.