These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 497330)
1. Statistical methods for classification of human chromosomes. Habbema JD Biometrics; 1979 Mar; 35(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 497330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing. Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between G band number and chromosome length from prophase to metaphase. Jagielski J; Haus O Acta Physiol Pol; 1983; 34(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 6637533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classification of chromosomes using a probabilistic neural network. Sweeney WP; Musavi MT; Guidi JN Cytometry; 1994 May; 16(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8033731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spectral karyotyping analysis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Singh B; Gogineni S; Goberdhan A; Sacks P; Shaha A; Shah J; Rao P Laryngoscope; 2001 Sep; 111(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 11568603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis. Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interphase cytogenetics of hematological cancer: comparison of classical karyotyping and in situ hybridization using a panel of eleven chromosome specific DNA probes. Poddighe PJ; Moesker O; Smeets D; Awwad BH; Ramaekers FC; Hopman AH Cancer Res; 1991 Apr; 51(7):1959-67. PubMed ID: 2004382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Homologue matching using the Choquet integral. Stanley RJ; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():315-20. PubMed ID: 9603059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A classification efficiency test of spectral karyotyping and multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization: identification of chromosome homologies between Homo sapiens and Hylobates leucogenys. Rens W; Yang F; O'Brien PC; Solanky N; Ferguson-Smith MA Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2001 May; 31(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 11284037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic chromosome analysis. II. Karyotyping of banded human chromosomes using band transition sequences. Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K Clin Genet; 1981 Jan; 19(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 7460378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An efficient multiple-cell approach to automatic aneuploidy screening. Carothers AD; Rutovitz D; Granum E Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Sep; 5(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 6651019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Speicher MR; Gwyn Ballard S; Ward DC Nat Genet; 1996 Apr; 12(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 8630489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data-driven homologue matching for chromosome identification. Stanley RJ; Keller JM; Gader P; Caldwell CW IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 9735908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A modular framework for the automatic classification of chromosomes in Q-band images. Poletti E; Grisan E; Ruggeri A Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Feb; 105(2):120-30. PubMed ID: 21963236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Investigation of human cytogenetics for research on human evolution]. Bullerdiek J; Bartnitzke S Anthropol Anz; 1982 Jun; 40(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 7114824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On fully automatic feature measurement for banded chromosome classification. Piper J; Granum E Cytometry; 1989 May; 10(3):242-55. PubMed ID: 2714109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detecting abnormal human chromosome constitutions by dual laser flow cytogenetics. Lebo RV; Golbus MS; Cheung MC Am J Med Genet; 1986 Nov; 25(3):519-29. PubMed ID: 2431619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]