These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4976503)

  • 1. Problems involving working model techniques.
    Cheeseborough CA
    Dent News (Lond); 1969 Mar; 6(3):6. PubMed ID: 4976503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques using addition silicone impression material.
    Penaflor CF; Semacio RC; De Las Alas LT; Uy HG
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 49(4):37-49. PubMed ID: 10202524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials.
    Al-Bakri IA; Hussey D; Al-Omari WM
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 17508620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Working model with "periodontium"].
    Eberhardt F; Marxkors R
    Dent Labor (Munch); 1973 Nov; 21(11):1169-71. PubMed ID: 4599558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [From impression to model].
    Franz G
    Quintessenz Zahntech; 1980 Aug; 6(8):107-14. PubMed ID: 7043599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Impression and model--practical claims and scientific principles].
    Voss R
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Feb; 27(2):96-118. PubMed ID: 4551314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Preparation of accurate working models].
    Bauer A
    Quintessence Dent Technol; 1976 Feb; 1(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 800874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A technique to verify or correct analogue position and soft tissue profile on an implant working cast.
    Vitale ND; Tung F; Goldstein G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 19703619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simplified reliable impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Pameijer CH
    J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1983 Oct; 57(4):159-60. PubMed ID: 6421899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working times of elastomeric impression materials determined by dimensional accuracy.
    Tan E; Chai J; Wozniak WT
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 8639243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of five impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of master models.
    Fenske C
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11210270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impression success using the dual arch technique.
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):396-7. PubMed ID: 16366044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft tissue transfer models: the patient-dentist-laboratory connection.
    Saba S
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 Sep; 64(8):584-5. PubMed ID: 9785689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.