These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4979824)

  • 21. Protocol for the dosimetry of x- and gamma-ray beams with maxi um energies between 0-6 and 50 MeV. Scientific Committee on Radiation Dosimetry (SCRAD) of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
    Phys Med Biol; 1971 Jul; 16(3):379-96. PubMed ID: 4997748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF DOSIMETRY OF FAST ELECTRONS].
    MARKUS B
    Strahlentherapie; 1964 Mar; 123():350-65 CONTD. PubMed ID: 14172653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The implementation of the AAPM Task Group 21 protocol by the Radiological Physics Center and its implications.
    Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF; Shalek RJ; Berkley LW
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 6434921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comment on "determination of the depth of 50% of maximum ionization, I50, for electron beams by the divided difference method" [med. phys. 31, 2068-2074 (2004)].
    McEwen M
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3158-9; author reply 3160. PubMed ID: 15587668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role of humidity and other correction factors in the AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocol.
    Rogers DW; Ross CK
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 3352550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Review of the energy check of an electron-only linear accelerator over a 6 year period: sensitivity of the technique to energy shift.
    Biggs PJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):635-9. PubMed ID: 12722815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implications of adopting the AAPM TG-21 calibration protocol for very high energy photon and electron beams.
    Zwicker RD; Wu A; Sternick ES
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 6434922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dose distribution and stability of radiotherapy electron beams from a linear accelerator.
    Naylor GP; Williams PC
    Br J Radiol; 1972 Aug; 45(536):603-9. PubMed ID: 4625693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. AAPM Task Group 21 protocol: dosimetric evaluation.
    Paul JM; Koch RF; Philip PC
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 3929049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Depth dose studies in electron beam therapy. Effects on anagen mouse hairs.
    Anzl LH; Malkinson FD; Ahrens TJ
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1968 Aug; 103(4):863-70. PubMed ID: 4971128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Evaluation on the effect of dosimetry using a depth of calibration point or a depth of temporary dose maximum in high energy electron beams.].
    Haneda K; Hatakeyama N; Koyama T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 16135893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Mandatory calibration of dosimeters used in radiotherapy].
    Engelke BA; Oetzmann W
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1987 Feb; 163(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 3563873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Results of quality controls for individual doses to patients in radiation oncology].
    Roth J
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Oct; 184(10):505-9. PubMed ID: 19016038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intercomparisons of absorbed dose determinations in 10 to 35 MeV electron radiation.
    Svensson H; Hettinger G; Frost D; Pohlit W
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1971 Feb; 10(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 4994276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The new AAPM protocol for the determination of dose from high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Sternick ES; Schulz RJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1985 Mar; 11(3):645-6. PubMed ID: 3918975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dosimetry intercomparisons and protocol for heavy charged particle therapy beams.
    Smith AR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1982 Dec; 8(12):2061-3. PubMed ID: 6819267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Studies on the dependency of the biologic effect of high energy electrons on the tissue depth].
    Fehrentz D
    Strahlentherapie; 1968 Jul; 136(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 4971711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dosimetric measurements at the nordic medical accelerators. I. Characteristics of the radiation beam.
    Svensson H; Hettinger G
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1971 Jun; 10(3):369-84. PubMed ID: 4999386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.