These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4984135)

  • 1. Oral response to pin implants: First experimental evaluation.
    Doms PF
    J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1970 Jan; 44(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 4984135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental evaluation of biodegradable ceramics as a substitute for bone grafting.
    Laufer D; Ben-Aryeh H; Kerner H; Gutman D; Mordohovich D; Ish-Shalom M; Fischer R; Harel L
    Isr J Dent Sci; 1988 Nov; 2(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 3270376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The use of endo-osseous parts in dentistry. II. Pin implants, tridents and combined solutions].
    Komári J
    Fogorv Sz; 1969 Feb; 62(2):39-43. PubMed ID: 5251677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Tantalum, metal of Apollo 11...and dental implants. Scialom tells all about implants ...].
    Leao M
    Rev Odontoimplantol; 1970 Apr; 34():31-40. PubMed ID: 5268752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.
    Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Tantalum metal of Apollo 11 ... and dental implants].
    Leao M
    Rev Odontoimplantol; 1969 Dec; 30():36-40. PubMed ID: 5265592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experimental studies of tetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) for dental implants].
    Markus Z; Zaklan-Kavić D; Kobler P
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1983; 17(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 6584020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An experimental evaluation of ostamer and tantalum powder in intraperiosteal implant dog surgery.
    Herschfus L
    J Oral Implant Transplant Surg; 1965; 11():12-7. PubMed ID: 5214619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dynamics of bone and implantology].
    de Carvalho Miguel R; Longo Guerrieri G
    Zahnarztl Prax; 1988 Aug; 39(8):300-3. PubMed ID: 3268020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Biochemical evaluation of bone metabolism in patients with subperiosteal implants].
    Souza JA; Canton P; Mueller SB
    Rev Bras Pesqui Med Biol; 1971; 4(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 5160927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mineralization at the interface of implants.
    Joos U; Wiesmann HP; Szuwart T; Meyer U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):783-90. PubMed ID: 16697141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Special report: the interfacial behavior of biomaterials, 1979.
    Hench LL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Nov; 14(6):803-11. PubMed ID: 7052209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Engineering of bone tissue with porcine bone marrow stem cells in three-dimensional trabecular metal: in vitro and in vivo studies.
    Zou X; Li H; Baatrup A; Lind M; Bünger C
    APMIS Suppl; 2003; (109):127-32. PubMed ID: 12874964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Physiologic basis of implantation].
    Michelet FX
    Rev Odontostomatol Midi Fr; 1971; 29(4):227-30. PubMed ID: 5154016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Tolerance of bone to three-dimensional implants].
    Doms P
    Inf Dent; 1974 Oct; 56(41):63-7. PubMed ID: 4529847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
    Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
    Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of the influence of the cortical bone on the primary stability of two implant systems.
    Andrés-García R; Vives NG; Climent FH; Palacín AF; Santos VR; Climent MH; Bullón P
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Feb; 14(2):E93-7. PubMed ID: 19179957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systemic influences on the bone response to dental and orthopedic implants.
    Wakley GK; Baylink DJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1988; 14(3):285-311. PubMed ID: 3270690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide.
    Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Andersson B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 8820121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Possibilities for improvement of the surface properties of dental implants (2). The use of ceramic oxides in surface coating for titanium and tantalum implants].
    Szabó G; Kovács L; Vargha K
    Fogorv Sz; 1995 Feb; 88(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 7875341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.