These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4994276)

  • 1. Intercomparisons of absorbed dose determinations in 10 to 35 MeV electron radiation.
    Svensson H; Hettinger G; Frost D; Pohlit W
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1971 Feb; 10(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 4994276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of chemical and ionization dosimetry for high-energy x-ray and electron beams.
    Durocher JJ; Boese H; Cormack DV; Holloway AF
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 6798385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AAPM-HPA survey of high-energy electron depth-dose data.
    Schulz RJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1969 Jul; 161(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 4979824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation on the effect of dosimetry using a depth of calibration point or a depth of temporary dose maximum in high energy electron beams.].
    Haneda K; Hatakeyama N; Koyama T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 16135893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ionization chamber for therapy-level dosimetry of electron beams.
    Morris WT; Owen B
    Phys Med Biol; 1975 Sep; 20(3):718-27. PubMed ID: 810816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determinations of Ngas and Prepl factors from commercially available parallel-plate chambers: AAPM Task Group 21 protocol.
    Kubo H; Kent LJ; Krithivas G
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(6):908-12. PubMed ID: 3099146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Angular distributions of absorbed dose of Bremsstrahlung and secondary electrons induced by 18-, 28- and 38-MeV electron beams in thick targets.
    Takada M; Kosako K; Oishi K; Nakamura T; Sato K; Kamiyama T; Kiyanagi Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Mar; 153(3):369-83. PubMed ID: 22761326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of a Fricke dosimeter at high energy photon and electron beams used in radiotherapy.
    Moussous O; Khoudri S; Benguerba M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2011 Dec; 34(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 21850550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.
    Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG;
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Relative biological efficiency of electron and photons of a 42-MeV- betatron. LD 50/30 in mice].
    Heuss K
    Strahlentherapie; 1975 Apr; 149(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 806147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
    Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct determination of k
    Krauss A; Kapsch RP
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(3):035041. PubMed ID: 29327693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [DOSIMETRY OF HIGH-ENERGY X-RAYS AND ELECTRONS (ESTIMATION OF ABSORBED DOSE IN WATER FROM "R"-READINGS OF PRACTICAL DOSIMETER)].
    MATSUZAWA H; KAWASHIMA K; HIRAOKA T; INADA T; HOSHINO K; SAKATA S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1964 Aug; 24():468-72. PubMed ID: 14204104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Intercomparison of high energy radiation dosimetry in Japan. II. Intercomparison of JAPM sub-standard dosimeters and absorbed dose for high energy electrons (author's transl)].
    Shiragai A; Kato Y; Hashizume T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 34(6):428-32. PubMed ID: 4216880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
    Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Distribution of dosage created in water by electrons and positrons with 5, 10 and 15 MeV energy].
    Tarutin IG; Kudin VI; Gumanskiĭ GA
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1970 Mar; 15(3):78-9. PubMed ID: 4987677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Measuring the absorbed energy of deceleration radiation and of beams of fast electrons with a graphite calorimeter].
    Ermakov IA; Sinitsyna AP
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1970 Mar; 15(3):65-71. PubMed ID: 4987676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electron backscatter corrections for parallel-plate chambers.
    Hunt MA; Kutcher GJ; Buffa A
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 3127670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.