124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4999532)
1. The changing patterns of cervix cancer.
Christopherson WM
CA Cancer J Clin; 1971; 21(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 4999532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Geographic & age variations in invasive cervical cancer in Kentucky, 1995-1999.
Wyatt S; Ross FE; Bottorff D; Lancaster M
J Ky Med Assoc; 2002 Oct; 100(10):441-6. PubMed ID: 12395746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening.
Bray F; Loos AH; McCarron P; Weiderpass E; Arbyn M; Møller H; Hakama M; Parkin DM
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Mar; 14(3):677-86. PubMed ID: 15767349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An island-wide screening program for cervical neoplasia in Barbados.
Vaillant HW; Cummins GT; Richart RM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1968 Aug; 101(7):943-6. PubMed ID: 5659952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is cervical carcinoma in situ a significant lesion?
Green GH
Int Surg; 1967 Jun; 47(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 6033236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
Moller KA; Fogh H; Moller PE; Strandbygard K
Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytology and colposcopy in mass screening for cervical cancer.
Grönroos M; Hautera P; Järvi O; Kangas S; Rauramo L
Acta Cytol; 1967; 11(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 5230438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
Sato S; Mikino H; Matsunaga G; Yajima A
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening program for squamous cell carcinoma of cervix.
Lundberg WI
Wis Med J; 1973 Jun; 72(6):146-7. PubMed ID: 4713533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mass screening for cancer and precancerous conditions of cervix uteri. A preliminary report.
Messelt OT; Höeg K
Acta Cytol; 1967; 11(1):39-40. PubMed ID: 5230439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A critical evaluation of the vaginal irrigation kit as a screening method for the detection of cancer of the cervix.
Anderson WA; Gunn SA
Acta Cytol; 1966; 10(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 5227363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Challenges in screening for cancer of the cervix: delivery, technology and evaluation of programs.
Morgan PP
Can Med Assoc J; 1982 Oct; 127(7):571-2. PubMed ID: 7127224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in Alberta.
Starreveld AA; Hill GB; Brown LB; Koch M
Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Nov; 125(10):1105-9. PubMed ID: 7326641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Walton report and its subsequent impact on cervical cancer screening programs in Canada.
Worth AJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 6694805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Characteristics of uterine cancer detected by mass screening].
Igarashi T; Konno R; Sato S; Yajima A
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Aug; 25(10):1519-26. PubMed ID: 9725043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Epidemiological aspects of detection of carcinoma of the cervix in the region of Ljubljana].
Kovacic J; Bonta S
Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Jan; 23(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 5553174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Registration of carcinoma in situ and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the screening area of Nijmegen from 1 January 1970 through 31 July 1982].
Klinkhamer PJ; van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1984 Oct; 128(42):1979-83. PubMed ID: 6504185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the impact of screening for cancer of the cervix.
Miller AB
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):149-60. PubMed ID: 3570400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of the National Cervical Screening Programme on the presentation of cancer of the cervix in Canterbury.
Simcock B; Sykes P; Laney M
N Z Med J; 2001 Aug; 114(1138):378-80. PubMed ID: 11589435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Results of mass screening tests for cervix cancer carried out in our department].
Noda K; Saito H; Okuda N; Aneba K; Morizuka T
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1965 Sep; 17(9):1039-43. PubMed ID: 5895182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
