These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A five-year plan for population research and family planning services. 3. Family planning services. Beckles FN Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Oct; 3(4):49-64. PubMed ID: 5140234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of family planning programs in Iran and Turkey. Fendall NR HSMHA Health Rep; 1971 Nov; 86(11):1011-24. PubMed ID: 5138279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiagency participation in family planning administration. Allen JE; Jain SC HSMHA Health Rep; 1971 Aug; 86(8):699-705. PubMed ID: 5115603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures. Forrest JD; Samara R Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Family planning in the 1970s--a dynamic force affecting the status of children. Gray NT Child Welfare; 1971 Mar; 50(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 5164338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. State administration and financing of family planning services. Weinberg D Fam Plann Perspect; 1972 Apr; 4(2):32-41. PubMed ID: 5052570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Financial management. An overview. Wood JC Top Health Care Financ; 1974; 1(1):1-80. PubMed ID: 4469364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Birth control, teen-agers and the law: a new look, 1971. Pilpel HF; Wechsler NF Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Jul; 3(3):37-45. PubMed ID: 5122276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The costs and benefits of government expenditures for family planning programs. Chamie M; Henshaw SK Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(3):117-8, 120-4. PubMed ID: 6788597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AFDC, family allowances and illegitimacy. Cutright P Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Oct; 2(4):4-9. PubMed ID: 5538317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Korea/Taiwan 1969: report on the national family planning programs. Ross JA; Han DW; Keeny SM; Cernada GP; Hsu TC; Sun TH Stud Fam Plann; 1970 Jun; (54):1-16. PubMed ID: 5538465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Field structures in family planning. Ahmad W Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Jan; 2(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 5113344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. India: UN mission evaluation of the family planning program. Mates L; Mathsson B; Easterlin R; Engstrom L; Florendo S Stud Fam Plann; 1970 Aug; (56):4-18. PubMed ID: 5006245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Law and family planning. Lee LT Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Apr; 2(4):81-98. PubMed ID: 5113349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Premarital counseling in California. Shonick H Health Serv Rep; 1972 Apr; 87(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 5022812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Eighteen months later: family planning services in the United States, 1969. Dryfoos JG; Jaffe FS; Weintraub DR; Cobb JP; Bernsohn CJ Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Apr; 3(2):29-44. PubMed ID: 5098785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What state governments can do. Weinberg D Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Mar; 2(2):30-4. PubMed ID: 4938715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]