These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 500863)

  • 1. The soap chamber test. A new method for assessing the irritancy of soaps.
    Frosch PJ; Kligman AM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1979 Jul; 1(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 500863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Irritancy ranking of 31 cleansers in the Indian market in a 24-h patch test.
    Lakshmi C; Srinivas CR; Anand CV; Mathew AC
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Aug; 30(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 18713074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skin irritancy of commercially available soap and detergent bars as measured by water vapour loss.
    van der Valk PG; Crijns MC; Nater JP; Bleumink E
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1984; 32(3):87-90. PubMed ID: 6468282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of four soaps on skin trans-epidermal water loss and erythema index.
    Khosrowpour Z; Ahmad Nasrollahi S; Ayatollahi A; Samadi A; Firooz A
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2019 Jun; 18(3):857-861. PubMed ID: 30160004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison testing of soap irritancy using aluminum chamber and standard patch methods.
    Shellow WV; Rapaport MJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Mar; 7(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 7238015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of the effects on the skin of a classical bar soap and a syndet cleansing bar in normal use conditions and in the soap chamber test.
    Barel AO; Lambrecht R; Clarys P; Morrison BM; Paye M
    Skin Res Technol; 2001 May; 7(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 11393212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Irritancy of low concentrations of soap and synthetic detergents as measured by skin water loss.
    Hassing JH; Nater JP; Bleumink E
    Dermatologica; 1982 May; 164(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 7095222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study of the cytotoxic and irritant effects of skin cleansing soaps.
    Castanedo-Cázares JP; Cortés-García JD; Cornejo-Guerrero MF; Torres-Álvarez B; Hernández-Blanco D
    Gac Med Mex; 2020; 156(5):418-423. PubMed ID: 33372931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential order of skin responses to surfactants during a soap chamber test.
    Simion FA; Rhein LD; Grove GL; Wojtkowski JM; Cagan RH; Scala DD
    Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Oct; 25(4):242-9. PubMed ID: 1799988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Has mildness replaced cleanliness next to godliness?
    Wolf R
    Dermatology; 1994; 189(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 7949470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toxicity of handcleaners.
    van Ketel WG; Bruynzeel DP; Bezemer PD; Stamhuis HI
    Dermatologica; 1984; 168(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 6698271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of various grit-containing cleansers on skin barrier function.
    Wigger-Alberti W; Fischer T; Greif C; Maddern P; Elsner P
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Sep; 41(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 10475511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skin biophysical assessments of four types of soaps by forearm in-use test.
    Khosrowpour Z; Ahmad Nasrollahi S; Samadi A; Ayatollahi A; Shamsipour M; Rajabi-Esterabadi A; Yadangi S; Firooz A
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Jul; 21(7):3127-3132. PubMed ID: 34741581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of a measure of acute irritation to predict the outcome of repeated usage of hand soap products.
    Williams C; Wilkinson M; McShane P; Pennington D; Fernandez C; Pierce S
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Jun; 164(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 21332456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contact sensitivity to Irgasan DP 300.
    Roed-Petersen J; Auken G; Hjorth N
    Contact Dermatitis; 1975 Oct; 1(5):293-4. PubMed ID: 1235279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: evaluation of a cumulative human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Dec; 31(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 7962781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a standardized testing procedure for assessing the irritation potential of occupational skin cleansers.
    Elsner P; Seyfarth F; Antonov D; John SM; Diepgen T; Schliemann S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Mar; 70(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 24588368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regional differences in stratum corneum reactivity to surfactants. Quantitative assessment using the corneosurfametry bioassay.
    Henry F; Goffin V; Maibach HI; Piérard GE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Dec; 37(6):271-5. PubMed ID: 9455629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The irritant effect of soap in relation to epidermal permeability.
    BETTLEY FR
    Br J Dermatol; 1963 Mar; 75():113-6. PubMed ID: 13967851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of sweating on patch test reactions to soap.
    Bettley FR; Grice KA
    Br J Dermatol; 1966 Dec; 78(12):636-9. PubMed ID: 5955588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.