197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5011838)
1. Scalar perception and judgment of angles.
Stacey BG; Maclean IE
Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Feb; 34(1):295-8. PubMed ID: 5011838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of perspective and slant on perception of apparent size and distance.
Thompson JG; Valenti CA; Schiffman HR
Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Oct; 47(2):575-82. PubMed ID: 724393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance.
Gogel WC
Am J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 85(4):477-97. PubMed ID: 4660703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Familiar and relative size cues and surface texture as determinants of relative distance judgments.
Newman CV
J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 5083130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rate of apparent magnification as a cue to distance: laboratory investigation.
Ton WH
Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Aug; 35(1):283-8. PubMed ID: 5054052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Variations in size judgements as a function of surface texture.
Newman CV
Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 25(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 4515821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceived size and perceived distance of targets viewed from between the legs: evidence for proprioceptive theory.
Higashiyama A; Adachi K
Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):3961-76. PubMed ID: 16979687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transformation theory of size judgment.
Baird JC; Wagner M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):852-64. PubMed ID: 1834796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Motion parallax and absolute distance.
Ferris SH
J Exp Psychol; 1972 Oct; 95(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 5071906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The two illusions of Müller-Lyer: confusion theory reexamined.
Sekuler R; Erlebacher A
Am J Psychol; 1971 Dec; 84(4):477-86. PubMed ID: 5142060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Foreshortened tiles in paths converging on an observer viewing a picture: elevation and visual angle ratio determine perceived size.
Juricevic I; Kennedy JM; Abramov I
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 19304613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is there an error of the standard? A critique of Piaget's perceptual theory.
Begelman DA; Steinfeld GJ
Genet Psychol Monogr; 1972 Aug; 86(1):81-117. PubMed ID: 5050996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Perception.
Leibowitz HW; Harvey LO
Annu Rev Psychol; 1973; 24():207-40. PubMed ID: 4198918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Observer movement and size constancy.
Combe E; Wexler M
Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 20483845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The role of overhang in the perceptual determination of length of two horizontal lines with staggered ends].
Pinard A
Can J Psychol; 1973 Jun; 27(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 4711495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A note on "Gravity as a monocular cue for perception of absolute distance and/or absolute size".
Tresilian JR
Perception; 1994; 23(6):727-31; discussion 733-5. PubMed ID: 7845764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Note on development of perception of size.
Masin SC
Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):788-94. PubMed ID: 18229534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distance perception in a natural outdoor setting: is there a developmental trend to overconstancy?
Da Silva JA; Matsushima EH; Aznar-Casanova JA; Ribeiro-Filho NP
Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):285-94. PubMed ID: 17120707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of runway image shape and approach angle magnitude by pilots in simulated night landing approaches.
Mertens HW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1981 Jul; 52(7):373-86. PubMed ID: 7271667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Runway width effects in the visual approach to landing.
Galanis G; Jennings A; Beckett P
Int J Aviat Psychol; 2001; 11(3):281-301. PubMed ID: 11858256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
