These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5011838)

  • 1. Scalar perception and judgment of angles.
    Stacey BG; Maclean IE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Feb; 34(1):295-8. PubMed ID: 5011838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of perspective and slant on perception of apparent size and distance.
    Thompson JG; Valenti CA; Schiffman HR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Oct; 47(2):575-82. PubMed ID: 724393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance.
    Gogel WC
    Am J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 85(4):477-97. PubMed ID: 4660703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiar and relative size cues and surface texture as determinants of relative distance judgments.
    Newman CV
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 5083130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rate of apparent magnification as a cue to distance: laboratory investigation.
    Ton WH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Aug; 35(1):283-8. PubMed ID: 5054052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations in size judgements as a function of surface texture.
    Newman CV
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 25(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 4515821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived size and perceived distance of targets viewed from between the legs: evidence for proprioceptive theory.
    Higashiyama A; Adachi K
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):3961-76. PubMed ID: 16979687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transformation theory of size judgment.
    Baird JC; Wagner M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):852-64. PubMed ID: 1834796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motion parallax and absolute distance.
    Ferris SH
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Oct; 95(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 5071906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The two illusions of Müller-Lyer: confusion theory reexamined.
    Sekuler R; Erlebacher A
    Am J Psychol; 1971 Dec; 84(4):477-86. PubMed ID: 5142060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Foreshortened tiles in paths converging on an observer viewing a picture: elevation and visual angle ratio determine perceived size.
    Juricevic I; Kennedy JM; Abramov I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 19304613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there an error of the standard? A critique of Piaget's perceptual theory.
    Begelman DA; Steinfeld GJ
    Genet Psychol Monogr; 1972 Aug; 86(1):81-117. PubMed ID: 5050996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception.
    Leibowitz HW; Harvey LO
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1973; 24():207-40. PubMed ID: 4198918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observer movement and size constancy.
    Combe E; Wexler M
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 20483845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The role of overhang in the perceptual determination of length of two horizontal lines with staggered ends].
    Pinard A
    Can J Psychol; 1973 Jun; 27(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 4711495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A note on "Gravity as a monocular cue for perception of absolute distance and/or absolute size".
    Tresilian JR
    Perception; 1994; 23(6):727-31; discussion 733-5. PubMed ID: 7845764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Note on development of perception of size.
    Masin SC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):788-94. PubMed ID: 18229534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distance perception in a natural outdoor setting: is there a developmental trend to overconstancy?
    Da Silva JA; Matsushima EH; Aznar-Casanova JA; Ribeiro-Filho NP
    Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):285-94. PubMed ID: 17120707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of runway image shape and approach angle magnitude by pilots in simulated night landing approaches.
    Mertens HW
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1981 Jul; 52(7):373-86. PubMed ID: 7271667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Runway width effects in the visual approach to landing.
    Galanis G; Jennings A; Beckett P
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 2001; 11(3):281-301. PubMed ID: 11858256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.