These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 501273)

  • 21. Undermatching on concurrent variable-interval schedules and the power law.
    Wearden JH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jan; 33(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 7365402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.
    Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):269-81. PubMed ID: 501274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Concurrent-schedule performance in dairy cows: persistent undermatching.
    Foster TM; Temple W; Robertson B; Nair V; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jan; 65(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 8583205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multiple schedules: effects of the distribution of reinforcements between component on the distribution of responses between conponents.
    Lander DG; Irwin RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Sep; 11(5):517-24. PubMed ID: 5722411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Resistance to change varies inversely with reinforcement context.
    Grace RC; Arantes J; Berg ME
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22503966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Choice, experience, and the generalized matching law.
    Todorov JC; de Oliveira Castro JM; Hanna ES; Bittencourt de Sa MC; Barreto MQ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep; 40(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 6631314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Concurrent schedules: discriminating reinforcer-ratio reversals at a fixed time after the previous reinforcer.
    Cowie S; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 23943395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 17416469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of reinforcement context on choice.
    Jacob TC; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 May; 49(3):367-81. PubMed ID: 3385353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changing behavior within session: cyclicity and perseverance produced by varying the minimum ratio of a variable-ratio schedule.
    Andrzejewski ME; Field DP; Hineline PN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):235-46. PubMed ID: 11394488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acquisition of choice in concurrent chains: Assessing the cumulative decision model.
    Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2016 May; 126():82-93. PubMed ID: 27005579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pigeons' preference for free choice: number of keys versus key area.
    Cerutti D; Catania AC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Nov; 68(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 9375386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement.
    Zeiler MD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Jul; 11(4):405-14. PubMed ID: 5672249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules in a dynamic choice environment.
    Bell MC; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Nov; 108(3):367-397. PubMed ID: 29110297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adaptive learning and forgetting in an unconventional experimental routine.
    Bell-Garrison D; Rice NC; Kyonka EGE
    Anim Cogn; 2018 May; 21(3):315-329. PubMed ID: 29442251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relation between response rates and reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.
    Pliskoff SS; Shull RL; Gollub LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 5660708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Within-session patterns in variable-interval schedule performance: Variation with deprivation level.
    Pinkston JW; Saulsgiver K; Branch MN
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jul; 75(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 17446011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Choice with frequently changing food rates and food ratios.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):246-74. PubMed ID: 24403110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantifying transitions in response allocation with change point analysis in concurrent chains.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2014 May; 104():91-8. PubMed ID: 24565979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Matching since Baum (1979).
    Wearden JH; Burgess IS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 7175431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.