74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5018758)
1. A simpler method for optimizing the window of the Anger camera for 99m Tc.
Lange RC
J Nucl Med; 1972 May; 13(5):342. PubMed ID: 5018758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing the window of an Anger camera for 99m Tc.
Sanders TP; Sanders TD; Kuhl DE
J Nucl Med; 1971 Nov; 12(11):703-6. PubMed ID: 5113629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A measure of Anger-camera linearity: results with and without a corrector.
Koral KF; Schrader ME; Knoll GF
J Nucl Med; 1981 Dec; 22(12):1069-74. PubMed ID: 7310515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of accuracy in activity calculations for the conjugate view method from Monte Carlo simulated scintillation camera images using experimental data in an anthropomorphic phantom.
Jönsson L; Ljungberg M; Strand SE
J Nucl Med; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1679-86. PubMed ID: 16204718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the scintillation camera with a conventional rectilinear scanner using technetium-99m pertechnetate in a tumor brain phantom.
Telander GT; Loken MK
J Nucl Med; 1967 Jul; 8(7):487-501. PubMed ID: 6032746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is (99m)Tc-labelled pamidronate a better agent than (99m)Tc-medronate for bone imaging?
Kumar V; Kumar D; Howman-Giles RB; Little DG
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Feb; 28(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 17198350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary imaging studies with a large crystal scintillation camera.
Hayes M
J Nucl Med; 1971 Feb; 12(2):93-4. PubMed ID: 5539595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-body gamma camera imaging using a moving table accessory.
Lee VW; Sano R; Freedman G
J Nucl Med; 1973 Nov; 14(11):830-3. PubMed ID: 4743039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods of correcting Anger camera deadtime losses.
Sorenson JA
J Nucl Med; 1976 Feb; 17(02):137-41. PubMed ID: 1245876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of window fraction on the deadtime of Anger cameras: concise communication.
Wicks R; Blau M
J Nucl Med; 1977 Jul; 18(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 874153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Anger tomographic scanner and the 15-in. scintillation camera for gallium imaging.
Hauser MF; Gottschalk A
J Nucl Med; 1978 Sep; 19(9):1074-7. PubMed ID: 690710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artifacts in iodine-131 renal images due to coincidence summing of technetium-99m photons.
Harris CC; Wilkinson RH; Schuler FR
Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):505-7. PubMed ID: 6849100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Brain scanning using a gamma camera. (PHO-gamma 3)].
Handa J; Nabeshima S; Handa H; Hamamoto K; Kosaka T
No To Shinkei; 1969 Dec; 21(12):1331-42. PubMed ID: 5395296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The mean transit time determined with the gamma camera as a value of the cerebral blood flow.
Klanova J; Heinis P
Radiol Clin Biol; 1972; 41(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 5069464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Artifacts in 99m Tc-sulfur colloid liver scans.
Hernberg JG; Braunstein P; Chandra R; Blum M
J Nucl Med; 1971 Oct; 12(10):697-8. PubMed ID: 5112220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Imaging properties of the scintillation camera (according to Anger for emitters of different energy].
Jahns E
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1966; 7(6):749-59. PubMed ID: 5965925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Letter: Anger camera deadtime.
Huttig M
J Nucl Med; 1974 Jun; 15(6):468-9. PubMed ID: 4829214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Methods for calculating the deadtime of Anger camera systems.
Adams R; Zimmerman D
J Nucl Med; 1973 Jul; 14(7):496-8. PubMed ID: 4711265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of a coaxial germanium gamma-ray camera.
Strauss MG; Sherman IS; Brenner R; Lenkszus FR
J Nucl Med; 1974 Dec; 15(12):1196-200. PubMed ID: 4427151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of true counting rate and the photopeak fraction of detected events on Anger camera deadtime.
Arnold JE; Johnston AS; Pinsky SM
J Nucl Med; 1974 Jun; 15(6):412-6. PubMed ID: 4829200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
