These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 50217)

  • 1. Distortion of averaged post-auricular muscle responses due to system bandwidth limits.
    Thornton AR
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Aug; 39(2):195-7. PubMed ID: 50217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Basic properties of the sound-evoked post-auricular muscle response (PAMR).
    O'Beirne GA; Patuzzi RB
    Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 138(1-2):115-32. PubMed ID: 10575120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation for the utility of the post-auricular response evoked by acoustic stimuli in objective audiometry (author's transl)].
    Ohashi T; Otsuki J
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1975 Sep; 78(9):826-38. PubMed ID: 1240140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The postauricular myogenic response in normal children and children with microtia.
    Takagi N; Suzuki T; Matsuo K; Kobayashi K
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1984; 241(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 6517745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Co-activation of the M. transversus auris with eye movements (Wilson's oculo-auricular phenomenon) and with activity in other cranial nerves.
    Schmidt D; Thoden U
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1978 Jun; 206(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 308327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The click-evoked post-auricular myogenic response in normal subjects.
    Dus V; Wilson SJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Nov; 39(5):523-5. PubMed ID: 52447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Electrical activation of human external auricular muscles (at rest and during perception of acoustic signals)].
    Iurkianets EA; Matiushkin DP
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1973 Mar; 75(3):16-9. PubMed ID: 4804634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal EMG signal bandwidth and interelectrode distance for the recording of acoustic, electrocutaneous, and photic blink reflexes.
    van Boxtel A; Boelhouwer AJ; Bos AR
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Nov; 35(6):690-7. PubMed ID: 9844430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The click-evoked postauricular response and its clinical application (author's transl)].
    Okudaira T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1977 Sep; 80(9):889-901. PubMed ID: 597356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):619-34. PubMed ID: 26226607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Encoder response of isolated frog muscle spindle elicited by pseudorandom noise stimuli.
    Querfurth H
    J Neurophysiol; 1986 Jan; 55(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 3485187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scalp recorded auditory evoked potentials and sonomotor responses: an evaluation of components and recording techniques.
    Streletz LJ; Katz L; Hohenberger M; Cracco RQ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1977 Aug; 43(2):192-206. PubMed ID: 69530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-level frequency-following response.
    De Boer E; Machiels MB; Kruidenier C
    Audiology; 1977; 16(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 880127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Averaged evoked myogenic responses in normal man.
    Cody DT; Bickford RG
    Laryngoscope; 1969 Mar; 79(3):400-16. PubMed ID: 5776736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Electrocochleographic potential pattern, recorded by different pick-ups (author's transl)].
    Zöllner C; Karnahl T
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1975 Aug; 54(8):681-8. PubMed ID: 129640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrocochleography recorded non-invasively from the external ear.
    Stone JL; Hughes JR; Kumar A; Meyer D; Subramanian KS; Zalkind MS; Fino J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 63(5):494-6. PubMed ID: 2420566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential sensitivity to rotation measured on potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the guinea-pig ear.
    Charlet de Sauvage R; Erre JP; Aran JM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep; 92(5):462-8. PubMed ID: 7523091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Short-latency auditory evoked potentials at the retroauricular region].
    Yajima K; Konno K; Sobue H; Nakai O; Seino O
    No To Shinkei; 1972 Jan; 24(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 4333594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of the intensity and rhythm of stimulation on the action potential of the cochlear nerve and retroauricular sonomotor response in normal ears].
    Bochenek W; Bochenek Z; Bieniek J
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1978; 32(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 714451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory evoked averaged responses in monkeys.
    Nagafuchi M; Cody DT
    Laryngoscope; 1972 Jul; 82(7):1126-44. PubMed ID: 4627888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.