These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5022472)

  • 1. Tracking performance with visual, auditory, or electrocutaneous displays.
    Hofmann MA; Heimstra NW
    Hum Factors; 1972 Apr; 14(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 5022472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of visual, auditory, and cutaneous tracking displays when divided attention is required to a cross-adaptive loading task.
    Schori TR
    Ergonomics; 1973 Mar; 16(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 4726649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory, visual, and bimodal data link displays and how they support pilot performance.
    Steelman KS; Talleur D; Carbonari R; Yamani Y; Nunes A; McCarley JS
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2013 Jun; 84(6):560-6. PubMed ID: 23745283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of randomly delayed visual and auditory feedback on keying performance.
    Long J
    Ergonomics; 1975 May; 18(3):337-47. PubMed ID: 1193082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tracking performance with advanced and delayed visual displays.
    Gifford RN; Lyman J
    Hum Factors; 1967 Apr; 9(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 6039261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative effects of display mode and input function on tracking performance.
    Christ RE; Newton RR
    J Exp Psychol; 1970 Aug; 85(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 5482025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlations between motor learning and visual and arm adaptation under conditions of computer-stimulated visual distortion.
    Gyr J; Willey R; Gordon DG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Oct; 35(2):551-61. PubMed ID: 5081286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of kinesthetic-tactual and visual displays via a critical tracking task.
    Jagacinski RJ; Miller DP; Gilson RD
    Hum Factors; 1979 Feb; 21(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 468269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device.
    Akamatsu M; MacKenzie IS; Hasbroucq T
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):816-27. PubMed ID: 7729406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual search in complex fields: size differences between target disc and surrounding discs.
    Bloomfield JR
    Hum Factors; 1972 Apr; 14(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 5022473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory and visual perception of rhythm by performers skilled in selected motor activities.
    Huff J
    Res Q; 1972 May; 43(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 4533519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decrements in tracking and visual performance during vibration.
    Collins AM
    Hum Factors; 1973 Aug; 15(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 4743999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applicability of location compatibility to the arrangement of display and control in human - vehicle systems: comparison between young and older adults.
    Murata A; Moriwaka M
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 17178654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response feedback and motor learning.
    Adams JA; Goetz ET; Marshall PH
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Mar; 92(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 5060708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CONTROL SYSTEM LAGS AND MAN-MACHINE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE. NASA CR-83.
    MUCKLER FA; OBERMAYER RW
    NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1964 Jul; ():1-31. PubMed ID: 14241456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist.
    Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Russell WJ; Jenkins S; Liu D; Green N; Llewelyn K; Cole P; Shek V; Krupenia SS
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18499611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response feedback and short-term motor retention.
    Adams JA; Marshall PH; Goetz ET
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Jan; 92(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 5059186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring with head-mounted displays: performance and safety in a full-scale simulator and part-task trainer.
    Liu D; Jenkins SA; Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Leane T; Kruys A; Russell WJ
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Oct; 109(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 19762741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of two-component electrocutaneous stimuli.
    MacFie HJ; Thomson DM
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Nov; 30(5):473-82. PubMed ID: 7329765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.