These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5025737)

  • 21. Visual identification and memory in monkeys with circumscribed inferotemporal lesions.
    Wilson M; Kaufman HM; Zieler RE; Lieb JP
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1972 Feb; 78(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 4621690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gestalt variables and feature measures as predictors of discrimination latency for polygon patterns.
    Mavrides CM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):919-25. PubMed ID: 5127214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance of retarded and nonretarded adolescents when processing relevant and irrelevant information.
    Morelan SJ; Prehm HJ; Warrick DB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Jun; 42(3):771-4. PubMed ID: 1272725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The psychological refractory period and the effect of stimulus discriminability.
    Tolkmitt FJ; Lunn SE
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 4742381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of retroactive and proactive interference on learning and memory in old and young rats.
    Winocur G
    Dev Psychobiol; 1984 Sep; 17(5):537-45. PubMed ID: 6479455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction outcome, S-R compatibility, and choice reaction time.
    Whitman CP; Geller ES
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Dec; 91(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 5134673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Focused spatial attention is independent of rapid resumption of an interrupted search.
    Lleras A; Enns JT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):565-77. PubMed ID: 19304647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Human performance in contingent information-processing tasks.
    Biederman I
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 May; 93(2):219-38. PubMed ID: 5025729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attribute preference and discrimination shifts in young children.
    Trabasso T; Stave M; Eichberg R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1969 Oct; 8(2):195-209. PubMed ID: 5356734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Processing capacity in a letter-matching task.
    Comstock EM
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 4744501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of prestimulus cuing and target load variability on maintenance of response strategies in a visual search task.
    Hearns JF
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Aug; 99(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 4742549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Signal detection theory and probability matching apply to vigilance.
    Craig A
    Hum Factors; 1987 Dec; 29(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 3436621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Discrimination learning in the pigeon with two relevant cues, one hard and one easy.
    Williams DI
    Br J Psychol; 1972 Aug; 63(3):407-9. PubMed ID: 4666246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture for deviant information.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 17433096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acoustical confusion, short-term memory, and latency of recall.
    Wolk S; Snelbecker GE
    J Gen Psychol; 1972 Jul; 87(1st Half):77-83. PubMed ID: 5043865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Stroop phenomenon: some critical tests of the response competition hypothesis.
    Nealis PM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Aug; 37(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 4727989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attention vs. retention in discrimination learning of low-MA retarded adults and MA-matched nonretarded children.
    Mackie R; Mackay CK
    Am J Ment Defic; 1982 Mar; 86(5):543-7. PubMed ID: 7124807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Recoding in a memory search task.
    Swanson JM; Johnsen AM; Briggs GE
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Apr; 93(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 5013335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stroop-like effects in a new-code learning task: A cognitive load theory perspective.
    Hazan-Liran B; Miller P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1878-1891. PubMed ID: 27434675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Constant irrelevant cues and stimulus generalization in monkeys.
    Flagg SF; Medin DL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1973 Nov; 85(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 4202124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.